This document obsoletes RFC 4871 for which there is an IPR disclosure (
http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1547/ ). As this is a move from Proposed to
Draft, is a new IPR disclosure required?
The disclosure you cite *is* the new one, which applies to the 4871bis
draft (disclosure 1547 updates disclosure 920, which applied to RFC
4871 only). Yahoo! will update the disclosure again when 4871bis gets
its own RFC number.
Barry, DKIM working group chair
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf