RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive C

Rui:

Ignored is a strong word....and does not bear scrutiny if you comapre the 
current document with the comments recevied. Attached is a spreadsheet of 
comment disposition for comments received during LC which included MPLS WG, BFD 
WG and those comments received from Q10.

Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:mpls-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Rui Costa
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 3:03 PM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; IETF-Announce
Cc: mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive 
Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for 
MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard

IMHO and for the record:        

ITU-T comments regarding this draft haven't been discussed with ITU-T but were 
simply ignored. No LS describing these comments' resolution was sent.    

Several service providers regarded this draft as not meeting their transport 
networks' needs.   

[The v03 draft was published in Feb and went to WG LC.  
The v04 draft addressing WG LC comments was published on the 28th June (same 
date as the proto write-up).       
When was the WG LC launched, to verify LC comments resolution?] 

Regards,        
Rui


-----Original Message-----
From: mpls-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:mpls-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of The IESG
Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Junho de 2011 14:47
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> (Proactive 
Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for 
MPLS Transport Profile) to Proposed Standard


The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG
(mpls) to consider the following document:
- 'Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check and Remote
   Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile'
  <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-05.txt> as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final 
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the 
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2011-07-14. Exceptionally, comments 
may be sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain 
the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract

   Continuity Check, Proactive Connectivity Verification and Remote
   Defect Indication functionalities are required for MPLS-TP OAM.

   Continuity Check monitors the integrity of the continuity of the
   label switched path for any loss of continuity defect. Connectivity
   verification monitors the integrity of the routing of the label
   switched path between sink and source for any connectivity issues.
   Remote defect indication enables an End Point to report, to its
   associated End Point, a fault or defect condition that it detects on
   a pseudo wire, label switched path or Section.

   This document specifies methods for proactive continuity check,
   continuity verification, and remote defect indication for MPLS-TP
   label switched paths, pseudo wires and Sections using Bidirectional
   Forwarding Detection.


The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi/

IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi/


No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls


_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

Last Call Comments with resolutionv6.xls
Description: Last Call Comments with resolutionv6.xls

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf