On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:36:10PM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Scott Schmit wrote:
_http._tcp.example.com. SRV 0 99 80 www.example.com.
_http._tcp.example.com. SRV 0 1 80 www-ds.example.com.
www.example.com. A 198.0.2.1
www-ds.example.com. A 198.0.2.2
www-ds.example.com. AAAA 2001:db8::2
I.e., content providers could control/measure their probability of
failure.
Are you saying content providers will actively control their probability
of failure from 99.99%> to 99% or 99.1% (assuming 10% IPv6 deployment)
only to promote IPv6?
I'm saying that they can be IPv6-ready without affecting their bottom
line (at least, as they perceive it). Whether they will or not--as you
point out--is another thing altogether, but at least it takes away an
often-used excuse.
Also, I've seen comments along the lines of "I want to phase in the IPv6
traffic" this allows that to happen.
--
Scott Schmit
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf