ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?

2011-07-27 11:15:00
    > From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops(_at_)u-1(_dot_)phicoh(_dot_)com>

    > I think it would be quite weird to keep 6to4 at standards track just to
    > prevent some vendors from dropping 6to4 support.

There have been suggestions that it might be more appropriate to reclassify
it as Experimental, and I think that makes a lot of sense - as you correctly
(IMO) point out, due to its issues 6to4 is not really appropriate for
standards track (at least, in its current form).

        Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>