On 8/30/2011 11:19 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
Hello all,
I've observed several problems with submission mechanism for RFC Errata.
Here they are:
First, we have only two types of errata - Technical or Editorial. In
presence of
<http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/rfc-metadata-errata.html>, "IESG
Statement on IESG Processing of RFC Errata concerning RFC Metadata", I
think the third type is necessary - Metadata.
I agree with this part of the proposal, at least.
--
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf