IETF Discussion (date)
August 31, 2011
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 19:37
- Re: 2119bis, Mark Nottingham, 16:58
- Re: 2119bis, Hector, 15:20
- Re: 2119bis, Melinda Shore, 15:16
- Re: 2119bis, Tony Hansen, 15:10
- RE: 2119bis, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:00
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 14:50
- Re: you can't force people to write well, was 2119bis, John Levine, 14:45
- Re: 2119bis, Hector, 14:43
- Re: 2119bis, Melinda Shore, 14:28
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 14:14
- Re: 2119bis, Hector, 14:14
- RE: 2119bis, Christer Holmberg, 14:13
- Re: 2119bis, Hector, 14:06
- RE: 2119bis, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:39
- Re: 2119bis, Randy Presuhn, 13:31
- RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Christer Holmberg, 13:06
- RE: 2119bis, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:00
- Re: 2119bis, Hector, 12:56
- RE: 2119bis, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:34
- Re: 2119bis, Jari Arkko, 12:17
- Re: 2119bis, Michael Richardson, 11:51
- Re: 2119bis - SHOULD Classifications, Hector Santos, 11:32
- Re: non-2119, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 11:27
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Keith Moore, 11:25
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, John C Klensin, 11:19
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 11:03
- Re: 2119bis, Hector, 10:55
- Re: 2119bis, Peter Saint-Andre, 10:54
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 10:52
- Re: 2119bis, Peter Saint-Andre, 10:51
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Spencer Dawkins, 10:51
- Re: 2119bis, Jari Arkko, 10:48
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Keith Moore, 10:47
- Re: 2119bis, Jari Arkko, 10:44
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, John C Klensin, 10:36
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Keith Moore, 10:35
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Keith Moore, 10:29
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Spencer Dawkins, 10:24
- non-2119, Tony Hansen, 10:10
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Keith Moore, 10:08
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, John Leslie, 10:07
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 09:50
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, John C Klensin, 09:43
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 09:36
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, John C Klensin, 09:16
- RE: 2119bis, Murray S. Kucherawy, 09:03
- Re: 2119bis, hector, 08:57
- Re: 2119bis, Scott O. Bradner, 08:29
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 08:26
- Re: 2119bis, Hector, 08:13
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 07:38
- Re: 2119bis, Hector, 07:30
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Keith Moore, 07:02
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Keith Moore, 06:51
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Keith Moore, 06:36
- Re: 2119bis, Mark Nottingham, 06:31
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Jari Arkko, 03:34
- Re: Limitations in RFC Errata mechanism, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 02:58
- Re: Limitations in RFC Errata mechanism, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 02:56
- Re: Limitations in RFC Errata mechanism, Julian Reschke, 02:43
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 02:42
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 02:37
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Eric Burger, 02:14
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Jari Arkko, 01:36
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, John C Klensin, 01:32
- RE: Limitations in RFC Errata mechanism, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:09
August 30, 2011
- Re: Limitations in RFC Errata mechanism, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 23:05
- RE: 2119bis -- Tying our hands?, Thomson, Martin, 22:48
- Re: 2119bis -- Tying our hands?, Dean Willis, 22:30
- Re: 2119bis, Richard Barnes, 22:20
- Re: 2119bis, Barry Leiba, 21:26
- Re: 2119bis, Brian E Carpenter, 19:41
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Brian E Carpenter, 19:41
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Brian E Carpenter, 19:14
- Re: 2119bis, ned+ietf, 17:40
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Keith Moore, 17:26
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Ole Jacobsen, 16:31
- Re: Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Keith Moore, 16:17
- Re: [mpls] [PWE3] IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, Stewart Bryant, 15:50
- RE: [mpls] [PWE3] IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, Alexander Vainshtein, 15:49
- Re: [mpls] [PWE3] IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, Stewart Bryant, 15:49
- Re: 2119bis, Hector Santos, 15:48
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, Henry B. Hotz, 15:47
- Discuss criteria for documents that advance on the standards track, Jari Arkko, 15:19
- Conclusion of the last call on draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Jari Arkko, 15:18
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Dean Willis, 15:01
- Re: 2119bis, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 15:00
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 14:19
- Re: 2119bis, Adam Roach, 14:15
- RE: Limitations in RFC Errata mechanism, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:10
- Re: 2119bis, hector, 14:09
- Re: 2119bis -- Tying our hands?, Adam Roach, 14:08
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 13:58
- Re: 2119bis, Adam Roach, 13:50
- Re: 2119bis, hector, 13:47
- Re: Limitations in RFC Errata mechanism, Wesley Eddy, 13:38
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 13:26
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 13:19
- RE: 2119bis, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:14
- Re: 2119bis, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 13:14
- RE: 2119bis, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:04
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 13:03
- RE: 2119bis, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:02
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 12:53
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 12:50
- Re: 2119bis, HLS, 12:31
- Re: 2119bis, Spencer Dawkins, 12:12
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 11:47
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 11:23
- Re: 2119bis, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 11:20
- Re: 2119bis, Martin Sustrik, 11:19
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 11:12
- Re: 2119bis, Bill McQuillan, 11:08
- Re: 2119bis, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 11:06
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 10:58
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 10:47
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 10:45
- Re: 2119bis, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 10:39
- Limitations in RFC Errata mechanism, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 10:19
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 09:58
- Re: 2119bis, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 09:54
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 09:35
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 09:32
- Re: 2119bis, HLS, 09:23
- Re: 2119bis, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 09:14
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 09:14
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 08:59
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 08:57
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 08:56
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 08:54
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 08:51
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 08:49
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 08:48
- RE: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Dearlove, Christopher (UK), 08:27
- Re: 2119bis, Marshall Eubanks, 08:25
- Re: Scheduling years in advance [Re: voting system for future venues?], Marshall Eubanks, 07:43
- Re: Scheduling years in advance [Re: voting system for future venues?], Thomas Narten, 07:34
- Scheduling years in advance [Re: voting system for future venues?], Brian E Carpenter, 07:12
- Re: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Alessandro Vesely, 06:10
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 05:05
- Re: 2119bis, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 04:28
- Re: 2119bis, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 04:13
- Re: 2119bis, Eliot Lear, 03:06
- Re: 2119bis, HLS, 03:00
- RE: 2119bis, Thomson, Martin, 02:24
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Henk Uijterwaal, 02:23
August 29, 2011
- RE: 2119bis, Murray S. Kucherawy, 23:34
- Re: 2119bis, HLS, 22:41
- Re: 2119bis, HLS, 22:30
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 22:14
- Re: 2119bis, Mark Nottingham, 21:55
- RE: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Michel Py, 21:50
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 21:46
- RE: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 20:53
- Re: 2119bis, ned+ietf, 20:51
- Re: 2119bis, Keith Moore, 20:47
- Re: 2119bis, Randy Presuhn, 20:05
- Re: 2119bis, Mark Nottingham, 19:08
- Re: schedules, was voting system for future venues?, John Levine, 18:16
- Re: 2119bis, Spencer Dawkins, 17:29
- Re: 2119bis, John C Klensin, 17:20
- Re: 2119bis, Brian E Carpenter, 17:16
- Re: 2119bis, Frank Ellermann, 17:16
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 17:12
- Re: 2119bis, Eric Burger, 17:09
- Re: 2119bis, Thomas Narten, 16:50
- 2119bis, Peter Saint-Andre, 16:37
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, Sam Hartman, 15:28
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, Sam Hartman, 15:27
- Re: voting system for future venues?, James M. Polk, 15:03
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Lixia Zhang, 14:19
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Melinda Shore, 13:21
- Re: https, t.petch, 13:10
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Scott Brim, 12:59
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Andrew Sullivan, 11:34
- Re: authenticated archives, was https, Keith Moore, 11:03
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Dave CROCKER, 10:50
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Richard L. Barnes, 10:47
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Andrew G. Malis, 10:46
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Scott Brim, 10:44
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:39
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Andrew Allen, 10:32
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 10:24
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Donald Eastlake, 10:23
- Please view attachment for a very important notice, AWARD CENTRE, 10:21
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Henk Uijterwaal, 10:20
- Re: authenticated archives, was https, Hector Santos, 10:20
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, Henry B. Hotz, 10:19
- RE: [Gen-art] Followup on Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-08, Mizikovsky, Semyon B (Simon), 10:18
- Re: [Gen-art] Followup on Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-08, Ben Campbell, 10:17
- RE: Followup on Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-08, Mizikovsky, Semyon B (Simon), 10:17
- Re: https, Hector Santos, 10:16
- Followup on Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-dime-ikev2-psk-diameter-08, Ben Campbell, 10:15
- Re: https, Hector Santos, 10:15
- Re: https, Hector Santos, 10:14
- Re: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Hector Santos, 10:13
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Joel jaeggli, 10:02
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Henk Uijterwaal, 10:01
- Re: authenticated archives, was https, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 09:59
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Keith Moore, 09:51
- Re: https, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 09:48
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 09:42
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, Sam Hartman, 09:04
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, Sam Hartman, 08:58
- RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, George, Wesley, 07:03
- Re: https, t.petch, 06:24
August 28, 2011
- Re: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Joel jaeggli, 15:13
- Re: https, Joel jaeggli, 14:55
- Re: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Joel jaeggli, 14:34
- Re: https, Joel jaeggli, 13:32
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Joel jaeggli, 13:24
- Re: https, ned+ietf, 11:49
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Eric Rescorla, 08:03
- RE: Questionnaire to survey opinion concerning a possible redefinition of UTC, Yaakov Stein, 07:44
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Keith Moore, 01:42
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Glen Zorn, 01:36
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Adam Novak, 00:25
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Glen Zorn, 00:06
August 27, 2011
- Re: https, Glen Zorn, 23:43
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Cullen Jennings, 13:22
- Re: authenticated archives, was https, Joel jaeggli, 12:43
- Re: https, ned+ietf, 12:11
- Re: authenticated archives, was https, John R. Levine, 11:53
- Re: authenticated archives, was https, t.petch, 11:39
- Re: https, Melinda Shore, 11:25
- Re: https, ned+ietf, 10:53
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Marshall Eubanks, 10:43
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Eric Rescorla, 10:31
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Cullen Jennings, 10:06
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, John Levine, 10:02
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Dave CROCKER, 09:57
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Cullen Jennings, 09:49
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Cullen Jennings, 09:48
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Cullen Jennings, 09:48
- Re: authenticated archives, was https, Keith Moore, 09:45
- Re: https, Dave CROCKER, 09:45
- Re: authenticated archives, was https, John Levine, 09:31
- Re: https, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:53
- Re: https, t.petch, 05:16
- Re: https, t.petch, 04:57
- Re: https, t.petch, 04:50
- Re: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Glen Zorn, 00:49
- Re: https, Glen Zorn, 00:29
August 26, 2011
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6 Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, Masataka Ohta, 23:32
- Re: https, John C Klensin, 18:44
- Re: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Brian E Carpenter, 17:47
- RE: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Michel Py, 16:47
- Re: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Doug Barton, 16:08
- RE: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 16:07
- Re: https, Doug Barton, 16:00
- Re: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Adam Novak, 15:57
- Re: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Doug Barton, 15:50
- Re: https, Eric Burger, 15:16
- Re: https, Melinda Shore, 14:32
- Re: https, Keith Moore, 14:28
- Re: https, Adam Novak, 14:22
- Re: https, ned+ietf, 14:10
- Re: https, Adam Novak, 13:25
- Re: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Keith Moore, 13:09
- Re: https, Adam Novak, 12:52
- RE: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, David Morris, 12:20
- Re: https, t.petch, 11:49
- Re: https, ned+ietf, 11:27
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, gareth.richards, 11:10
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, gareth.richards, 11:10
- RE: [Ietf-krb-wg] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, gareth.richards, 11:09
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, gareth.richards, 11:08
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, Henry B. Hotz, 11:08
- RE: [Ietf-krb-wg] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, david.black, 11:07
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, david.black, 11:07
- Re: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Scott Brim, 11:04
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, Simon Josefsson, 10:49
- RE: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 10:04
- Re: https, Melinda Shore, 09:52
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Mary Barnes, 09:49
- Re: https, Joel jaeggli, 09:44
- Re: https, John C Klensin, 09:41
- Re: https, t.petch, 09:36
- Re: https, Tim Bray, 09:24
- Re: Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Eric Burger, 08:56
- Re: https, Donald Eastlake, 08:44
- Re: https, Eric Burger, 07:58
- Re: https, Thomas Narten, 06:07
- Re: https, Scott Schmit, 05:51
- Re: https, Eliot Lear, 05:25
- Re: https, Bert Wijnen (IETF), 05:13
- Re: https, t.petch, 04:43
- Re: https, SM, 04:32
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Ole Jacobsen, 03:49
- https, t.petch, 03:24
- Re: Experiment for different schedule for Friday, Hadriel Kaplan, 02:24
- Re: Questionnaire to survey opinion concerning a possible redefinition of UTC, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:00
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Henk Uijterwaal, 01:23
- Re: Manila, was voting system for future venues?, John Levine, 00:47
August 25, 2011
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Agenda known in advance? was Re: Experiment for different schedule for Friday, Joel jaeggli, 23:03
- Re: Questionnaire to survey opinion concerning a possibleredefinition of UTC, Joel jaeggli, 22:54
- RE: Questionnaire to survey opinion concerning a possibleredefinition of UTC, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 22:27
- Re: Questionnaire to survey opinion concerning a possibleredefinition of UTC, Marshall Eubanks, 21:28
- Routing at the Edges of the Internet, Adam Novak, 20:58
- RE: voting system for future venues?, GT RAMIREZ, Medel G., 20:07
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Marshall Eubanks, 18:07
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Hadriel Kaplan, 17:32
- RE: Questionnaire to survey opinion concerning a possibleredefinition of UTC, Michel Py, 16:21
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Michal Krsek, 15:43
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Doug Barton, 15:37
- RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, John E Drake, 15:33
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Randall Gellens, 14:46
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Joel jaeggli, 13:57
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Randall Gellens, 13:42
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Sam Hartman, 13:22
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Stewart Bryant, 13:08
- Re: Questionnaire to survey opinion concerning a possible redefinition of UTC, Marshall Eubanks, 13:06
- Re: Questionnaire to survey opinion concerning a possible redefinition of UTC, Frank Ellermann, 12:51
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Melinda Shore, 12:42
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Hadriel Kaplan, 12:36
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Joel jaeggli, 12:18
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Mary Barnes, 12:17
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Hector Santos, 12:16
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, david.black, 12:15
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, david.black, 12:15
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Henk Uijterwaal, 12:14
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv-06.txt> (MPLSOn-demand Connectivity Verification and Route Tracing) toProposed Standard, Zhenlong Cui, 12:14
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, david.black, 12:13
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, geoff, 12:12
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, geoff, 12:12
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, geoff, 12:11
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, geoff, 12:10
- GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-clear-text-cred-02, kathleen.moriarty, 12:09
- Re: [OSPF] [karp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-05.txt> (Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3) to Proposed Standard, Acee Lindem, 12:09
- Re: [OSPF] [karp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-05.txt> (Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3) to Proposed Standard, Acee Lindem, 12:08
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, t.petch, 12:01
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Joel Jaeggli, 11:40
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv-06.txt> (MPLSOn-demand Connectivity Verification and Route Tracing) toProposed Standard, Yoshinori Koike, 11:34
- Re: [websec] Last Call: <draft-ietf-websec-origin-04.txt> (The Web Origin Concept) to Proposed Standard, Julian Reschke, 11:32
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Michael Richardson, 10:06
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Anshuman Pratap Chaudhary, 09:35
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Ole Jacobsen, 09:33
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Michael Richardson, 09:19
- RE: [IETF] Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 09:12
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Lou Berger, 09:08
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Tim Chown, 09:06
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:59
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Michael Richardson, 08:40
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Keith Moore, 06:06
- Questionnaire to survey opinion concerning a possible redefinition of UTC, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:24
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Doug Barton, 04:48
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Glen Zorn, 04:37
- Re: IAOC, travel and hotel prices, SM, 04:11
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Doug Barton, 03:53
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Henk Uijterwaal, 01:14
- Re: IAOC, travel and hotel prices (was RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?), Glen Zorn, 00:43
- Re: IAOC, travel and hotel prices (was RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?), Randall Gellens, 00:40
- Re: IAOC, travel and hotel prices (was RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?), Melinda Shore, 00:11
- Re: IAOC, travel and hotel prices (was RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?), Glen Zorn, 00:05
August 24, 2011
- RE: voting system for future venues?, GT RAMIREZ, Medel G., 23:36
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Ole Jacobsen, 23:05
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Randall Gellens, 22:43
- Re: voting system for future venues?, John C Klensin, 22:37
- Re: voting system for future venues?, ajs, 22:26
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Brian E Carpenter, 22:22
- RE: voting system for future venues?, Ole Jacobsen, 22:17
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Brian E Carpenter, 22:12
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Pete Resnick, 21:58
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18, Sam Hartman, 21:04
- RE: voting system for future venues?, GT RAMIREZ, Medel G., 20:54
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Ole Jacobsen, 20:43
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Ole Jacobsen, 20:37
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Stephen Farrell, 20:12
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Joel Jaeggli, 19:57
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Joel Jaeggli, 19:53
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Stephen Farrell, 19:41
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Stephen Farrell, 19:36
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Henning Schulzrinne, 19:02
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Ole Jacobsen, 18:32
- Re: [IETF] Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Geoff Mulligan, 18:15
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Geoff Mulligan, 18:10
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Joel Jaeggli, 17:45
- Re: [IETF] Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Warren Kumari, 17:44
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Stephen Farrell, 17:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard, Chris Newman, 17:21
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Ole Jacobsen, 17:08
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Keith Moore, 17:03
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Thomas Narten, 17:02
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Stephen Farrell, 17:01
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Eric Burger, 16:49
- Re: voting system for future venues?, Brian E Carpenter, 16:33
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Tim Chown, 16:31
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Thomas Narten, 16:30
- voting system for future venues?, Keith Moore, 16:13
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Ole Jacobsen, 16:11
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Donald Eastlake, 15:59
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Melinda Shore, 15:57
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Dave CROCKER, 15:56
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Thomas Nadeau, 15:40
- Re: IAOC, travel and hotel prices (was RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?), Randall Gellens, 15:35
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Alia Atlas, 15:33
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Dave CROCKER, 15:31
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Geoff Mulligan, 15:28
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Sam Hartman, 15:28
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Peter Saint-Andre, 15:27
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Dave CROCKER, 15:24
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Geoff Mulligan, 15:22
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Peter Saint-Andre, 15:19
- Re: Is the IAOC responsive?, Dave CROCKER, 15:14
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Dave CROCKER, 15:12
- Is the IAOC responsive?, Steve Crocker, 15:02
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Ole Jacobsen, 14:38
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Scott Brim, 14:37
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Sam Hartman, 14:29
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Melinda Shore, 14:10
- Re: IAOC, travel and hotel prices (was RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?), SM, 12:50
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-websec-origin-04.txt> (The Web Origin Concept) to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 12:38
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Keith Moore, 10:48
- RE: [OSPF] [karp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-05.txt> (Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3) to Proposed Standard, Bhatia, Manav (Manav), 10:29
- Re: [OSPF] [karp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-05.txt> (Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3) to Proposed Standard, Acee Lindem, 10:29
- Re: [OSPF] [karp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-05.txt> (Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3) to Proposed Standard, Acee Lindem, 10:28
- RE: [karp] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-05.txt> (Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3) to Proposed Standard, Bhatia, Manav (Manav), 10:27
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Andrew Sullivan, 09:34
- Re: Agenda known in advance? was Re: Experiment for different schedule for Friday, Fred Baker, 09:28
- RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, George, Wesley, 08:35
- IAOC, travel and hotel prices (was RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?), George, Wesley, 08:31
- Re: Experiment for different schedule for Friday, Andrew G. Malis, 08:29
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Keith Moore, 07:37
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Ray Pelletier, 07:18
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, t.petch, 06:20
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Keith Moore, 05:54
- RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Christer Holmberg, 02:53
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Joel Jaeggli, 00:55
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Glen Zorn, 00:44
- Re: Discussing a DISCUSS - down-refs in draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02, John C Klensin, 00:36
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Glen Zorn, 00:28
August 23, 2011
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Glen Zorn, 23:41
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Eric Burger, 23:40
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Glen Zorn, 23:35
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Peter Saint-Andre, 17:50
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Livingood, Jason, 17:34
- Re: Discussing a DISCUSS - down-refs in draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02, Sam Hartman, 17:03
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Ole Jacobsen, 16:27
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Donald Eastlake, 16:25
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Fred Baker, 16:17
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Fred Baker, 16:10
- RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 15:40
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Andrew Sullivan, 15:34
- Discussing a DISCUSS - down-refs in draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02, SM, 14:35
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, David Morris, 13:29
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Ole Jacobsen, 13:28
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Thomas Nadeau, 13:24
- RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Ole Jacobsen, 13:07
- RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 12:46
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Thomas Nadeau, 10:13
- Nomcom 2011-2012: Call for Nominations, NomCom Chair, 10:12
- Nomcom 2011-2012: Call for Nominations, NomCom Chair, 10:12
- Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-no-php-oob-mapping-09, Ben Campbell, 10:11
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-no-php-oob-mapping-08, Ben Campbell, 10:10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, Eric Rosen, 10:09
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Thomas Nadeau, 10:09
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, John C Klensin, 09:24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, Tim Chown, 09:09
- Re: Agenda known in advance? was Re: Experiment for different schedule for Friday, IETF Chair, 08:48
- RE: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 08:45
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Tim Chown, 07:31
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Tim Chown, 07:22
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Thomas Nadeau, 06:56
- Re: Agenda known in advance? was Re: Experiment for different schedule for Friday, Shane Kerr, 06:33
- Re: Agenda known in advance? was Re: Experiment for different schedule for Friday, Jaap Akkerhuis, 05:25
- Re: Agenda known in advance? was Re: Experiment for different schedule for Friday, Glen Zorn, 05:14
- Agenda known in advance? was Re: Experiment for different schedule for Friday, Shane Kerr, 05:09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6 Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, Peter Koch, 01:32
- Re: Experiment for different schedule for Friday, John C Klensin, 01:05
- Re: Experiment for different schedule for Friday, Eliot Lear, 00:41
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, John C Klensin, 00:35
August 22, 2011
- Re: Last Call: <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-03.txt> (IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Transition Space) to Informational RFC, SM, 23:25
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Michael StJohns, 22:13
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Michael StJohns, 21:22
- Re: Alternative to the Hyatt, Dave CROCKER, 21:01
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt>, Frank Ellermann, 19:42
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Marshall Eubanks, 19:30
- Alternative to the Hyatt, Dave CROCKER, 19:30
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Ray Pelletier, 19:17
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Ray Pelletier, 19:15
- Re: [IETF] Re: Experiment for different schedule for Friday, Warren Kumari, 18:39
- Re: Experiment for different schedule for Friday, Randall Gellens, 18:33
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt>, Brian E Carpenter, 18:03
- Re: Experiment for different schedule for Friday, James M. Polk, 17:55
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, Brian E Carpenter, 17:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-03.txt> (IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Transition Space) to Informational RFC, Chris Donley, 16:56
- Experiment for different schedule for Friday, IETF Chair, 16:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, ned+ietf, 16:02
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6 Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, SM, 15:50
- Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Lixia Zhang, 14:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6 Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, George, Wesley, 14:45
- Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?, Michael StJohns, 14:18
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, George, Wesley, 12:13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6 Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, George, Wesley, 12:12
- Re: [precis] Path towards a multilingalization IUse referent, Masataka Ohta, 11:36
- RE: [precis] Path towards a multilingalization IUse referent, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 11:07
- Re: IDNA and Multilingual Internet issues and vocabulary after IDNA2008, Hector Santos, 10:54
- Question about Policy Announcement and Query..., Todd Glassey, 10:03
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv-06.txt> (MPLS On-demand Connectivity Verification and Route Tracing) to Proposed Standard, venkatesan mahalingam, 09:22
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv-06.txt> (MPLS On-demand Connectivity Verification and Route Tracing) to Proposed Standard, venkatesan mahalingam, 09:21
- Re: [mpls] [PWE3] IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, Thomas Nadeau, 09:20
- Re: [mpls] [PWE3] IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, Luca Martini, 09:20
- RE: [mpls] [PWE3] IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, John E Drake, 09:19
- Re: [mpls] [PWE3] IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, Luca Martini, 09:18
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth, Henry B. Hotz, 09:18
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6 Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, George, Wesley, 09:00
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt>, Frank Ellermann, 07:10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, t.petch, 03:15
August 20, 2011
- Re: [precis] Path towards a multilingalization IUse referent, Andrew Sullivan, 22:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6 Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, Brian E Carpenter, 18:50
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6 Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, SM, 13:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard, Alexey Melnikov, 12:50
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-jesske-dispatch-update3326-reason-responses-05, Alexey Melnikov, 12:46
- Re: [iucg] IDNA and Multilingual Internet issues and vocabulary afterIDNA2008, Marie-France Berny, 02:45
- RE: [iucg] IDNA and Multilingual Internet issues and vocabulary afterIDNA2008, Dave Crocker, 00:08
August 19, 2011
- RE: [iucg] IDNA and Multilingual Internet issues and vocabulary afterIDNA2008, Michel Py, 21:55
- Re: [iucg] IDNA and Multilingual Internet issues and vocabulary after IDNA2008, Marie-France Berny, 19:22
- Re: IDNA and Multilingual Internet issues and vocabulary after IDNA2008, jean-michel bernier de portzamparc, 18:30
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6 Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, Brian E Carpenter, 18:15
- Re: Last Call: <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-03.txt> (IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Transition Space) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 18:06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-03.txt> (IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Transition Space) to Informational RFC, Frank Ellermann, 17:24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-03.txt> (IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Transition Space) to Informational RFC, SM, 16:42
- Re: Last Call: <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-03.txt> (IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Transition Space) to Informational RFC, Peter Koch, 16:30
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-grow-geomrt-05, Roni Even, 16:21
- Re: IDNA and Multilingual Internet issues and vocabulary after IDNA2008, John C Klensin, 15:38
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt> (IPv6 Support Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 15:37
- IDNA and Multilingual Internet issues and vocabulary after IDNA2008, jean-michel bernier de portzamparc, 13:35
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth, Henry B. Hotz, 13:24
- RE: [Ietf-krb-wg] AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth, gareth.richards, 13:24
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth, Greg Hudson, 13:23
- RE: AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth, gareth.richards, 13:22
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv-06.txt> (MPLS On-demand Connectivity Verification and Route Tracing) to Proposed Standard, Mach Chen, 13:21
- Re: [yam] Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard, S Moonesamy, 13:21
- A "Must See" in Taipei, Ole Jacobsen, 12:53
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth, Sam Hartman, 11:28
- Re: Last Call: <draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request-03.txt> (IANA Reserved IPv4 Prefix for Shared Transition Space) to Informational RFC, Keith Moore, 11:26
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth, Sam Hartman, 09:48
August 18, 2011
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth, Sam Hartman, 16:27
- Re: [yam] Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard, S Moonesamy, 10:35
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission, S Moonesamy, 10:34
- RE: [PWE3] IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, Alexander Vainshtein, 10:34
- RE: [mpls] [PWE3] IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, John E Drake, 10:33
- RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-no-php-oob-mapping-08, Zafar Ali (zali), 10:32
- Re: [PWE3] IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, Luca Martini, 10:31
- Re: [yam] Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 10:14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message, Martin Rex, 09:49
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-on-demand-cv-06.txt> (MPLS On-demand Connectivity Verification and Route Tracing) to Proposed Standard, Rolf Winter, 01:59
- Re: Last Call: <draft-eggert-successful-bar-bof-05.txt> (Considerationsfor Having a Successful "Bar BOF" Side Meeting) to Informational RFC, SM, 00:02
August 17, 2011
- RE: [PWE3] IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, Alexander Vainshtein, 12:42
- Re: [mpls] [PWE3] IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, Pablo Frank, 12:41
- RE: [mpls] [PWE3] IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, Shahram Davari, 12:40
- Re: [PWE3] IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, Pablo Frank, 12:40
- RE: IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, Alexander Vainshtein, 12:39
- Re: [yam] Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 11:21
- Re: Last Call: <draft-eggert-successful-bar-bof-05.txt> (Considerationsfor Having a Successful "Bar BOF" Side Meeting) to Informational RFC, John C Klensin, 03:38
August 16, 2011
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-geomrt-04.txt> (Multi-threaded Routing Toolkit (MRT) Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routing information export format with geo-location extensions) to Proposed Standard, Richard L. Barnes, 20:16
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-geomrt-04.txt> (Multi-threaded Routing Toolkit (MRT) Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routing information export format with geo-location extensions) to Proposed Standard, Terry Manderson, 19:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission, Martin Rex, 16:01
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-grow-geomrt-04.txt> (Multi-threaded Routing Toolkit (MRT) Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) routing information export format with geo-location extensions) to Proposed Standard, Richard L. Barnes, 15:44
- Re: Last Call: <draft-eggert-successful-bar-bof-05.txt> (Considerationsfor Having a Successful "Bar BOF" Side Meeting) to Informational RFC, Peter Saint-Andre, 14:11
- IETF Last Call comment on draft-ietf-pwe3-gal-in-pw, Alexander Vainshtein, 10:46
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18.txt> (OTP Pre-authentication) to Proposed Standard, Greg Hudson, 10:45
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Martin Rex, 10:09
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-23, Roni Even, 02:37
- FW: [PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-mpls-tp-gal-in-pw-01.txt> (Using the Generic Associated Channel Label for Pseudowire in MPLS-TP) to Proposed Standard, Yaakov Stein, 02:28
August 15, 2011
- Re: Gen-ART Review: Last Call <draft-ietf-p2psip-base-17.txt>, Mary Barnes, 19:56
- Re: Gen-ART Review: Last Call <draft-ietf-p2psip-base-17.txt>, Mary Barnes, 19:54
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18.txt> (OTP Pre-authentication) to Proposed Standard, Stephen Farrell, 18:55
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth-18.txt> (OTP Pre-authentication) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman, 18:47
- Re: Last Call: <draft-eggert-successful-bar-bof-05.txt> (Considerationsfor Having a Successful "Bar BOF" Side Meeting) to Informational RFC, Spencer Dawkins, 17:40
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Keith Moore, 13:35
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Russ Housley, 13:28
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Russ Housley, 13:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-05.txt> (Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman, 12:26
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-no-php-oob-mapping-08, Ben Campbell, 09:30
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission, S Moonesamy, 09:29
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Thomas Narten, 08:05
- RE: IESG voting procedures, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 07:54
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Thomas Narten, 07:53
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Thomas Narten, 07:48
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Keith Moore, 06:53
- RE: IESG voting procedures, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 04:51
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Bill McQuillan, 00:22
August 14, 2011
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Keith Moore, 20:36
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Barry Leiba, 20:30
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Keith Moore, 20:03
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Keith Moore, 20:01
- RE: IESG voting procedures, Ronald Bonica, 19:47
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Barry Leiba, 19:40
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Keith Moore, 19:16
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Brian E Carpenter, 19:05
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-sets-05.txt> (Deprecation of the use of BGP AS_SET, AS_CONFED_SET.) to Informational RFC, Mattia Rossi, 18:40
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Keith Moore, 16:56
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Keith Moore, 16:43
- RE: IESG voting procedures, Adrian Farrel, 16:42
- Re: IESG voting procedures, Brian E Carpenter, 16:10
- IESG voting procedures, Keith Moore, 11:29
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Russ Housley, 11:24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Hector Santos, 10:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Keith Moore, 08:38
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, jari . arkko, 08:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Keith Moore, 06:34
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, jari . arkko, 04:49
August 13, 2011
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Dave Crocker, 20:00
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Keith Moore, 17:08
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, ned+ietf, 17:05
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, John Leslie, 15:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Brian E Carpenter, 15:33
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission, ned+ietf, 13:48
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, ned+ietf, 13:46
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission, Alessandro Vesely, 10:43
- Re: Subject prefixes, Hector Santos, 05:56
- Subject prefixes, Nick Hilliard, 05:00
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Hector Santos, 02:06
August 12, 2011
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Keith Moore, 22:01
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, ned+ietf, 21:35
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard, ned+ietf, 21:08
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission, Martin Rex, 14:03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard, Joseph Yee, 10:42
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard, SM, 01:49
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Hector Santos, 01:24
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Yoav Nir, 00:26
August 11, 2011
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:54
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 23:39
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02.txt> (Message Submission for Mail) to Full Standard, Tony Hansen, 23:02
- Re: Gen-ART Review: Last Call <draft-ietf-p2psip-base-17.txt>, Scott O. Bradner, 19:50
- Re: Gen-ART Review: Last Call <draft-ietf-p2psip-base-17.txt>, Cullen Jennings, 19:43
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: sami -- State Migration, Mark Nottingham, 18:11
- Re: [Idr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-as-sets-05.txt> (Deprecation of the use of BGP AS_SET, AS_CONFED_SET.) to Informational RFC, Randy Bush, 17:12
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Patrik Halfar, 13:29
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Keith Moore, 12:01
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Joel Jaeggli, 11:30
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Barry Leiba, 11:26
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Martin Rex, 11:00
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: sami -- State Migration, Peter Saint-Andre, 10:55
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Andrew Sullivan, 10:25
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Richard Kulawiec, 10:16
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Richard Kulawiec, 10:15
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-shiomoto-ccamp-switch-programming, Ben Campbell, 10:14
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: sami -- State Migration, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 08:48
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, t.petch, 06:02
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Mikael Abrahamsson, 06:02
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-shiomoto-ccamp-switch-programming, Stewart Bryant, 05:52
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Ole Jacobsen, 05:47
August 10, 2011
- Re: is IETF trying to do too much?, Joel Jaeggli, 23:41
- Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: sami -- State Migration, Mark Nottingham, 20:41
- Gen-ART Review: Last Call <draft-ietf-lisp-lig-04.txt>, Mary Barnes, 14:26
- RE: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-shiomoto-ccamp-switch-programming, Adrian Farrel, 13:35
- Re: The fallacy of perfection, Alessandro Vesely, 12:50
- Re: [pim] tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-pim-mtid-08, Yiqun Cai, 10:45
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-eps-03.txt> (IPv6 in 3GPP Evolved Packet System) to Informational RFC, jouni korhonen, 10:44
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Ole Jacobsen, 07:20
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Glen Zorn, 04:35
- Re: The fallacy of perfection (Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email), Hector Santos, 03:58
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Ole Jacobsen, 03:07
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Mikael Abrahamsson, 02:42
- Re: The fallacy of perfection (Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email), SM, 02:19
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Glen Zorn, 02:17
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Glen Zorn, 01:02
- Re: [xml2rfc] Multiple authors in reference, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 00:06
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Martin Rex, 00:00
August 09, 2011
- Re: [xml2rfc] Multiple authors in reference, Frank Ellermann, 23:56
- Re: Gen-ART Review: Last Call <draft-ietf-p2psip-base-17.txt>, Mary Barnes, 18:15
- Gen-ART Review: Last Call <draft-ietf-p2psip-base-17.txt>, Mary Barnes, 18:05
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 17:43
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Dean Willis, 17:12
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Philip Smith, 13:58
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Barry Leiba, 13:57
- The fallacy of perfection (Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email), Carsten Bormann, 13:46
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Nathaniel Borenstein, 13:31
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Martin Rex, 12:17
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Edward Lewis, 11:58
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-eps-03.txt> (IPv6 in 3GPP Evolved Packet System) to Informational RFC, GangChen, 11:14
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Keith Moore, 11:05
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Richard Kulawiec, 10:19
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Wes Hardaker, 09:52
- Re: [xml2rfc] Multiple authors in reference, Glen Zorn, 07:54
- Re: [xml2rfc] Multiple authors in reference, Joel Jaeggli, 03:07
- Re: [xml2rfc] Multiple authors in reference, Glen Zorn, 02:30
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Peter Koch, 02:10
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Glen Zorn, 01:33
- Re: [xml2rfc] Multiple authors in reference, Glen Zorn, 01:32
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Glen Zorn, 01:29
- Re: [xml2rfc] Multiple authors in reference, Randy Bush, 01:07
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Glen Zorn, 01:01
August 08, 2011
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Doug Barton, 22:16
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, John Levine, 22:09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Hector Santos, 20:21
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Doug Barton, 19:17
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list, ned+ietf, 18:52
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, SM, 18:11
- RE: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt>(Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, SM, 18:11
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list, John C Klensin, 16:08
- You need to be aware that US Patent Laws have evolved and intentionally violating them is actionable no matter what the IETF tells you..., todd glassey, 15:58
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list, ned+ietf, 15:44
- RE: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic (yet again), Ronald Bonica, 13:37
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, John C Klensin, 13:28
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Joel Jaeggli, 13:08
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Keith Moore, 13:05
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, John C Klensin, 12:35
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:29
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Joel Jaeggli, 11:09
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, John C Klensin, 09:56
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?, Keith Moore, 09:55
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Joel Jaeggli, 09:49
- RE: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?, Frank Bulk, 09:46
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, John C Klensin, 09:46
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Eric Burger, 09:45
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, John C Klensin, 09:44
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Yoav Nir, 08:57
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Ole Jacobsen, 02:57
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Ole Jacobsen, 02:57
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Mark Nottingham, 01:32
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Glen Zorn, 01:26
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Glen Zorn, 00:59
August 07, 2011
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Mark Nottingham, 23:36
- RE: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Ross Callon, 22:47
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Hector Santos, 20:22
- RE: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt>(Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, GT RAMIREZ, Medel G., 19:59
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Michael Richardson, 19:25
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Pete Resnick, 12:59
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, John C Klensin, 11:31
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list, John C Klensin, 11:19
August 06, 2011
- Re: Last Call: <draft-yevstifeyev-ion-report-06.txt> (Report on the Experiment with IETF Operational Notes (IONs)) to Informational RFC, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 23:12
- RE: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 19:57
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Glen Zorn, 11:17
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Bob Hinden, 09:15
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Marshall Eubanks, 08:48
- Re: Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Glen Zorn, 02:49
August 05, 2011
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Dave CROCKER, 22:12
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Hector Santos, 21:54
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Doug Barton, 16:57
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, John C Klensin, 16:26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Brian E Carpenter, 15:56
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-eps-03.txt> (IPv6 in 3GPP Evolved Packet System) to Informational RFC, Jouni, 12:12
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-eps-03.txt> (IPv6 in 3GPP Evolved Packet System) to Informational RFC, Jouni, 12:12
- Queen Sirikit National Convention Center, Glen Zorn, 12:11
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Warren Kumari, 11:45
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Dave CROCKER, 10:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, SM, 04:51
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Julian Reschke, 03:46
August 04, 2011
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: [v6ops] Last Call: <draft-ietf-v6ops-3gpp-eps-03.txt> (IPv6 in 3GPP Evolved Packet System) to Informational RFC, GangChen, 21:56
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Hector Santos, 20:33
- Is BIOS in the IETF scope?, Krishna Birth, 13:43
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:38
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: happiana -- IETF/W3C/IANA Registry Happiness, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:37
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:33
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Richard Kulawiec, 11:45
- RE: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-dime-priority-avps-04, David Harrington, 11:44
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Hector Santos, 10:10
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Dave CROCKER, 09:55
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Julian Reschke, 09:24
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 09:13
- RE: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Worley, Dale R (Dale), 09:11
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Dave CROCKER, 09:05
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list, John C Klensin, 08:48
- Re: is IETF trying to do too much?, Michael Richardson, 08:45
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:26
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update, Sam Hartman, 08:26
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 04:08
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Peter Koch, 04:04
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Julian Reschke, 03:37
- Re: I-D Working groups and mailing list, Bill McQuillan, 02:12
August 03, 2011
- Re: Opening BCP 79 (was: Re: encouraging compliance with IPR disclosure rules), John C Klensin, 23:40
- I-D Working groups and mailing list, Hector Santos, 23:13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Hector Santos, 21:34
- RE: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:41
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Keith Moore, 18:33
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Hector Santos, 18:07
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, SM, 17:56
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Doug Barton, 17:40
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Dave Cridland, 17:40
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Brian E Carpenter, 16:45
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Tony Hansen, 16:45
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Hector Santos, 16:20
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Peter Saint-Andre, 15:45
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: happiana -- IETF/W3C/IANA Registry Happiness, Peter Saint-Andre, 14:55
- Re: New Non-WG Mailing List: happiana -- IETF/W3C/IANA Registry Happiness, Donald Eastlake, 14:50
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 14:47
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP, Russ Housley, 14:28
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Martin Rex, 14:27
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Randy Presuhn, 14:19
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, John R. Levine, 13:48
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 13:46
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Peter Saint-Andre, 13:28
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Andrew Sullivan, 13:22
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, John Levine, 13:22
- Re: is IETF trying to do too much?, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 13:17
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Michael Richardson, 12:59
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, todd glassey, 12:58
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, ned+ietf, 12:58
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, todd glassey, 12:55
- Re: is IETF trying to do too much?, Michael Richardson, 12:52
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 12:17
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Mykyta Yevstifeyev, 12:17
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, David Morris, 12:14
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Dave CROCKER, 11:56
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Peter Saint-Andre, 11:49
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Peter Koch, 11:40
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Peter Saint-Andre, 11:37
- Re: subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Dave CROCKER, 11:35
- subject_prefix on IETF Discuss?, Warren Kumari, 11:22
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Dave CROCKER, 10:38
- Re: Last Call: <draft-gundavelli-v6ops-pmipv6-address-reservations-00.txt> (Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifier for Proxy Mobile IPv6) to Informational RFC, Suresh Krishnan, 10:06
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, John C Klensin, 08:37
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, jari . arkko, 08:03
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Andrew Sullivan, 08:02
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:44
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Hector Santos, 06:43
- RE: "technical" plenary [was: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule], Ole Jacobsen, 06:16
- RE: "technical" plenary [was: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule], Christer Holmberg, 03:35
August 02, 2011
- Re: A modest proposal..., Dave CROCKER, 22:58
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Alia Atlas, 22:13
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Pete Resnick, 20:52
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 20:03
- Re: Languages, idiom, reference, subtext, ..., Joel M. Halpern, 19:28
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Joel M. Halpern, 19:24
- Re: A modest proposal..., Joel Jaeggli, 19:23
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Keith Moore, 18:29
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, John C Klensin, 17:51
- RE: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:59
- Re: "technical" plenary [was: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule], Eric Rescorla, 16:49
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Hector Santos, 16:32
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Brian E Carpenter, 16:09
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Dave CROCKER, 15:46
- Re: Ietf Digest, Vol 39, Issue 13, Maurice Zenarosa, 14:10
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, SM, 13:29
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Spencer Dawkins, 13:11
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Mark Nottingham, 12:46
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:37
- Call for Nominations: Applied Networking Research Prize (ANRP) for IETF-82, Lars Eggert, 12:29
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, John C Klensin, 12:28
- RE: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:11
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Wes Hardaker, 09:03
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Alessandro Vesely, 08:29
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Scott Brim, 07:34
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Thomas Nadeau, 07:05
- RE: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Adrian Farrel, 06:48
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Eric Burger, 06:24
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, t.petch, 04:27
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, t.petch, 04:09
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, t.petch, 03:31
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Glen Zorn, 03:19
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Jaap Akkerhuis, 01:24
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Hector Santos, 01:06
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Randall Gellens, 00:15
August 01, 2011
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Hector Santos, 23:51
- Secdir review of draft-doria-genart-experience-04, Tobias Gondrom, 21:51
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, John C Klensin, 21:34
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, John Levine, 19:41
- "technical" plenary [was: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule], Brian E Carpenter, 18:53
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Sam Hartman, 18:39
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, David Kessens, 18:36
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Paul Hoffman, 18:28
- is IETF trying to do too much?, Keith Moore, 18:28
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Margaret Wasserman, 18:02
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Keith Moore, 18:00
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, John Levine, 17:58
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Keith Moore, 17:37
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Tony Hansen, 17:22
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Joe Touch, 17:18
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Joel Jaeggli, 17:13
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Scott Brim, 16:53
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Andrew Allen, 16:50
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Brian E Carpenter, 16:47
- Re: A modest proposal..., Ole Jacobsen, 16:43
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Adam Roach, 16:38
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Keith Moore, 16:37
- Re: A modest proposal..., Keith Moore, 16:35
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, David Kessens, 15:49
- Minutes for IETF 81 Administrative Plenary, Russ Housley, 15:48
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Sam Hartman, 14:59
- Re: A modest proposal..., Mark Atwood, 14:58
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, John C Klensin, 14:47
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Barry Leiba, 14:43
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Scott Kitterman, 14:03
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Keith Moore, 13:59
- Re: Drafts Submissions cut-off, Andrew Sullivan, 13:56
- RE: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:50
- Drafts Submissions cut-off, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:31
- RE: Review of: draft-ietf-iab-draft-iab-dns-applications-02, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:30
- Re: A modest proposal..., Hadriel Kaplan, 12:09
- Re: A modest proposal..., Marshall Eubanks, 12:06
- Re: A modest proposal..., Riccardo Bernardini, 12:05
- secdir review of draft-ietf-msec-gdoi-update, Sam Hartman, 11:51
- Re: A modest proposal..., Margaret Wasserman, 11:47
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Scott Kitterman, 10:41
- Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, Peter Saint-Andre, 10:19
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Russ Housley, 10:10
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Yoav Nir, 09:50
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, John Leslie, 09:49
- Re: [v6ops] 6to4v2 (as in ripv2)?, Jeroen Massar, 09:34
- Re: RFC 6302: "Internet-Facing Server Logging": No Word about Privacy?, Peter Koch, 09:22
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Keith Moore, 09:20
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Keith Moore, 09:15
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Thomas Nadeau, 09:14
- RE: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Papadimitriou, Dimitri (Dimitri), 08:41
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, John Leslie, 08:40
- Re: A modest proposal for Friday meeting schedule, Thomas Nadeau, 08:13
- Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:58
- Re: "6to4 damages the Internet" (was Re:, Masataka Ohta, 00:30