Umm, wait. I'm confused.
The boilerplate in existing documents points to 2119, right? and the updated
boilerplate would point to this spec, if approved, right? so we're not
retroactively changing the meaning of anything, right?
What am I missing?
Spencer
----- Original Message -----
From: Keith Moore
To: Marc Petit-Huguenin
Cc: IETF discussion list ; Eric Burger
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: 2119bis
I could see maybe posting an erratum or a brief update to 2119, but I think
that reopening that document in general is a Very bad Idea. And for existing
documents that misuse SHOULD, the appropriate thing to do is to update those
documents or post errata to those documents, rather than try to retroactively
change the meaning of the keywords in those documents.
Keith
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf