---- Original Message -----
From: "David Kessens" <david(_dot_)kessens(_at_)nsn(_dot_)com>
To: "Russ Housley" <housley(_at_)vigilsec(_dot_)com>
Cc: "IETF" <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 10:49 PM
Russ,
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 11:10:24AM -0400, Russ Housley wrote:
I am discussing the possibility with the Secretariat and the IESG. I will
report back to the community as soon as possible.
I don't think this proposal should be pursued. The breaks fulfil an
important function and there is nothing wrong with a starting time of 9am.
The friday meetings are always going to be tough at the end of a week long
meeting but trying to compress the friday schedule would only make it
harder.
Yes, and has been said, Friday is travel time; with a 17:30 flight, a time to
dip into those sessions I never normally attend, with an 09:30 flight, I'm gone.
Anything that matters needs to be Monday to Thursday, and that includes
Plenaries. They may be boring, but that in itself is an important reflection of
the various I***s.
Tom Petch
David Kessens
---
On Jul 31, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
Something like this:
8:30-11:00 Session I
11:15-12:15 Session II
12:30-13:30 Session III
I really like it, as there are a bunch of post-IETF stuff, some of
which starts in the afternoon and thus conflicts with the IETF.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
David Kessens
---
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf