I don't know if there is a need for "template" changes or some formal
section in the write up, but it would seem to me that an author who
has reached a level of getting WG assigned and/or even started a
mailing list (IETF or otherwise) would be very eager to announce it in
a new I-D (01?) submission. But then again, I can imagine some that
don't wish to expose this for whatever reason, perhaps to keep the
"team" light (and private) until they feel its ready public work - or
not.
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
Dave CROCKER wrote:
On 8/4/2011 7:11 AM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
Once one knows the WG name,
And when there is no working group that the document is associated with?
In addition, there is a certain degree of exclusionary culture that
comes with a requirement that a new reader know how to derive a mailing
list address from a cryptic working group reference or go through the
work to find it.
One might argue that this is a test of their resolve and that we want to
filter against overly casual participation, but that seems an odd bit of
logic.
d/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf