Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
John Levine wrote:
I'm not unalterably opposed to subject tags, but I believe that the
IETF's dogfood is of the List-ID: flavor.
Which WG list do you suggest should be the guinea pig? Or shall we
change them all at once to remove the dreaded subject prefix? :)
What exactly are you discussing? List-Id: is present on this list
already, and the WG mailing lists I'm subscribed to have both,
List-Id: and subject_prefix.
subject_prefix will work even with very ancient MUAs, such as the
one I use, so I'm OK. But the subject_prefix does not scale well
when multiple IETF mailings lists are CC-ed and discussion ensues
(replying to all lists).
Will a subject_prefix confuse MUAs that support "threading" for
cross-posted discussions?
-Martin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf