-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/30/2011 12:18 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
On Aug 30, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
Does "SHOULD" get abused by some authors in some documents? Of course it
does.
But your crusade to throw out a useful tool just because it has been misused
on occasion is an extreme over-reaction. I like this tool. I use this tool.
If
you see people misusing it, slap them.
But don't ban the tool.
+1
I am wondering if having an Implementers Directorate, tasked to do reviews from
an implementation point of view, could not help discovering when a SHOULD can
create interoperability problems. I would certainly volunteer in such group.
- --
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Personal email: marc(_at_)petit-huguenin(_dot_)org
Professional email: petithug(_at_)acm(_dot_)org
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk5dQT4ACgkQ9RoMZyVa61eU3gCglqmaf07bpE1RJU9oN3YotGgS
T+oAoKeRCXuB2Ea+Bzy+nw+A7er0kURv
=bHul
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf