Please make my English language sensibilities and satisfy Burger's Second Law
of standards documents at the same time, forbidding passive voice. Can we have
the following as the boilerplate? Thanks.
Either:
In this document, [RFCXXXX] describes the following conformance terms: "MUST",
...
Or:
[RFCXXXX] describes the following conformance terms used in this document:
"MUST", ...
Also, from a typographic point of view, why are we quoting single worlds that
are already in quotes?
On Aug 29, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
After staring at http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=499 for
long enough, I finally decided to submit an I-D that is intended to
obsolete RFC 2119. I hope that I've been able to update and clarify the
text in a way that is respectful of the original. Feedback is welcome.
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-saintandre-2119bis-01.txt
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf