+1, too.
This goes along with my strong desire to eliminate passive voice, unless the
goal is to have the actor be obfuscated (as an example).
On Aug 30, 2011, at 5:29 AM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
2) I strongly believe that authors should be encouraged to enumerate the
potential subjects of conformance terms, and to use them in every instance.
For example, a requirement like this:
"""The Foo header MUST contain the "bar" directive"""
is ambiguous; it doesn't specify who has to do what. Rather,
"""Senders MUST include the "bar" directive when producing the Foo header;
recipients that receive a Foo header without a "bar" directive MUST ..."""
is unambiguous (assuming that the spec defines the terms "sender" and
"recipient").
+1.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf