ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: 2119bis

2011-08-30 02:24:33
On 2011-08-30 at 07:36:58, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
for long enough, I finally decided to submit an I-D that is intended 
to obsolete RFC 2119. 

<bike-shed>
IS THERE ANY CHANCE OF AGREEING THAT SHOUTING IS BAD?  (i.e., Burger's first 
anti-law.)  As opposed to mandating that requirements ought to be shouted.  
Lowercase "must" can be as effective as uppercase as long as it is consistently 
applied.
</bike-shed>

On a more serious note, many documents lean too heavily on conformance terms.

A gentle reminder that conformance terms ought to be sparingly used might not 
go astray here.  It's just like the F-bomb, it's a F-ing big deal if used 
infrequently enough.  People are more likely to pay attention when it's rare.

--Martin
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>