ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: 2119bis

2011-08-31 13:00:37
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Hector
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 10:57 AM
Cc: IETF discussion list
Subject: Re: 2119bis

But I don't think there's anything wrong with the definitions as we have 
them;
I think they've served us well for the last fourteen years.

Correct and by far, most deployments have use SHOULD = OPTION with an
documented right to IGNORE - so be it written so be it followed.

This sentence is self-contradictory.  "SHOULD" is, by definition, not 
"OPTIONAL".
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>