On Aug 15, 2011, at 2:28 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
My experience is that a technical flaw, even if it is a corner case, is acted
upon by the WG. There are rare cases where the WG has lost energy, but in
general the WG wants to produce a quality output. As a result, technical
flaws are not the place where things get messy. Rather, things get messy
over issues that have a political component.
What's the difference between "issues that have a political component" and
disagreements about whether there is a technical flaw? Seems to me that
people who don't want to admit that there's a technical flaw (or who can't
easily see it from their perspective) often dismiss the issue as a political
problem.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf