On Aug 25, 2011, at 2:13 AM, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
On 24/08/2011 23:12, Keith Moore wrote:
Maybe there needs to be some sort of voting system for future venues.
First of all, remember that the community asked for venue selections
2 to 3 years in advance. I don't think that many people can predict
if they will attend a meeting 2 years from now.
This proposal would require that the secretariat works out 3-4 proposals
for meeting locations in great detail. That is a lot more work than
the current approach: start with a few locations, discard options as
one goes along. More work means more costs and thus higher meeting fees.
I don't think it should be (much) more work to let attendees make the final
choice. (Though I admit that it's possible that presenting all of that
information in the best possible light for each venue might end up being time
consuming.)
But on what basis are the options discarded by IAOC, if the different options
aren't examined to at least the level of detail that I suggested?
Do we really want to increase fees just to have more options?
Not more options, but more transparency into the selection and more assurance
that the selection is made on the basis of what people really want or don't
want.
You'd be eligible to vote if you'd attended an IETF anytime within the past,
say, 2 years - or if you were willing to commit to attending the one you
vote on
if it wins. (say by putting down a deposit toward meeting fees).
Instead of picking one venue, the committee would solicit bids from N (say
3-4)
different venues within a geographic region. The bids would include:
* room cost per night in the conference hotel
* room cost per night in each of some small number of alternate hotels
* locations of said hotels and nature of transportation between there and
the
conference venue
* meeting fee for the entire week if that venue is chosen
* other pertinent information (like what kind of food is nearby, what kind
of
facilities there are in or near the venue for impromptu gathering, what
kinds of sightseeing opportunities there are, etc.)
Looking at past discussions on the mailing lists, this list will be a lot
longer.
No doubt.
That way, everyone could figure his own travel costs, factor in his own
willingness to stay further away for less cost, etc.
Not true: it is not possible (nor sensible) to buy plane tickets 2 years
in advance and a lot of things can change in between.
True. Though broadly speaking, if it's expensive to fly somewhere today, it's
unlikely to be cheap to fly there in two years.
(Admittedly, the real gotcha in Quebec seems to have been that there were so
few seats available that the few low-priced fares were quickly exhausted.
Everyone could get quotes two years in advance and all see the same cheap
fares, even if those fares were only available for say 10 seats per day.)
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf