ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] AD review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-otp-preauth

2011-08-19 13:24:46

On Aug 19, 2011, at 7:48 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:

"Greg" == Greg Hudson <ghudson(_at_)MIT(_dot_)EDU> writes:
87
   Greg> On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 08:53 -0400, 
gareth(_dot_)richards(_at_)rsa(_dot_)com wrote:
I had always thought the same way as Sam, that clients would be
required to implement all of the options since there appears to
be no other way for them to support different disconnected token
types.  The specification was intended to be token independent
and the assumption was always that the clients would also be.

   Greg> I agree, at least at the general level and for disconnected
   Greg> tokens.  (Does nextOTP make any sense for disconnected
   Greg> tokens?)

I think you prompt the person to hit the next value button

Or else wait for the time to roll-over to the next.

------------------------------------------------------
The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry(_dot_)B(_dot_)Hotz(_at_)jpl(_dot_)nasa(_dot_)gov, or 
hbhotz(_at_)oxy(_dot_)edu



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf