ned+ietf(_at_)mauve(_dot_)mrochek(_dot_)com
<ned+ietf(_at_)mauve(_dot_)mrochek(_dot_)com> wrote:
I really have to wonder if the entire yes/no-obj/discuss voting model
is appropriate for document advancement. For initial approval at
proposed, sure, having the ability to "discuss" the document makes
all sorts of sense. But for subsequent steps that virtue is a lot
obvious, to me at least.
This, IMHO, is the right question: Does yes/no-obj/discuss resolve
the right issues when advancing from PS to DS?
There is a perception, at least, that any AD can block progress to
DS (though in fact the process is more complicated, that's the way it's
perceived).
I could somewhat-seriously suggest that the IESG shouldn't have to
vote at all on advancement to DS -- the right issues are questions of
fact which could perfectly well be delegated.
(And wearing my Narrative-Scribe hat, I know how confusing it is
for IESG members to figure out what's expected of them when the question
is advancement of maturity level.)
--
John Leslie <john(_at_)jlc(_dot_)net>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf