-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Alessandro Vesely
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:28 AM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: DKIM Signatures now being applied to IETF Email
It was not a difficult problem. [...] how to scale the
authorization of 3rd party signer. [...] But there was a
fundamental mindset and marketing conflict. It was a conflict of
3rd party resigner market right to exist uncontrolled, unrestricted
regardless of originating DKIM message claims.
Marketing pressure on IETF protocols may be business as usual, but
DKIM managed to come out pretty cleanly neutral in this respect,
AFAICS[*].
I think the claim that marketing somehow entered into the guidance of DKIM's
evolution is specious, and that's being polite. I've yet to see any evidence
at all, short of unfounded assertions about the unspoken agendas of the
participants, to back it up.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf