----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Nadeau" <tnadeau(_at_)lucidvision(_dot_)com>
To: "Alia Atlas" <akatlas(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
Cc: "Sam Hartman" <hartmans-ietf(_at_)mit(_dot_)edu>; "Dave CROCKER"
<dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net>;
<ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 10:39 PM
On Aug 24, 2011, at 4:33 PM, Alia Atlas wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Dave CROCKER <dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net>
wrote:
On 8/24/2011 1:27 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
Can you start by backing up the assertion that the community has
vigrously expressed a preference for interesting venues?
I may just need a new IETF community:-)
gosh, I hadn't thought that that was less than obvious, given the vote for
quebec and many, many comments about venue choice over the years.
I'm one who really liked Minneapolis - we had excellent meeting space, places
to run into each other, reasonable food access, and a clueful hotel.
Is it interesting to go to new places? Sure and if I'm lucky I might get a
morning or afternoon to look around. Would I be perfectly happy going to the
same 2-3 places every year? Absolutely.
I am with you on that. I do not attend IETFs as a vacation and sight-seeing
opportunity.
<tp>
Yes, I too go to work, and would rate Minneapolis in the top three, with Atlanta
perhaps just above it.
Tom
</tp>
--Tom
Alia
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf