-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Richard Shockey
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 7:19 AM
To: 'IETF Discussion'
Subject: RE: Review of: draft-ietf-iab-draft-iab-dns-applications-02
I would like to add my support here to Dave Crocker's very thoughtful and
IMHO accurate description of this revised draft. I share his views that the
substantive criticisms have not been addressed.
+1.
In particular, I'm missing what important message this draft presents that is
not already discussed in RFC5507.
If there are issues with new uses of the DNS, DNSEXT or DNSOPS are fully
chartered to provide community review and do not need any "fuzzy" guidance
on what is and is not acceptable. This entire draft could beeasily
simplified byt a one sentence statement.
"If you need to do database look ups in the future we would prefer that you
think of using protocols other than the DNS."
Right, and it's not clear to me we need a full IAB document stating that. And,
there are plenty of people on the DNS Directorate as well as others scattered
throughout the IETF that make this point on a regular basis already.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf