ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Last Call: <draft-gundavelli-v6ops-pmipv6-address-reservations-00.txt> (Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifier for Proxy Mobile IPv6) to Informational RFC

2011-09-22 16:36:38
Hi Sri,

On 11-09-21 08:44 PM, Sri Gundavelli wrote:
Two MAG's in the same broadcast domain can be ruled out, as there is no
mechanism for the nodes to decide on who should support the attached MN.
More over, we still have the P2P link assumption and so multiple MAG's in
the same broadcast domain is not possible. So, we are fine on this aspect.
Stepping back a bit, IMO, 5453 issue is not applicable for the P2P link and
given that its a managed mobility domain. So, I wonder, if the concern is
valid in PMIPv6 context ?

I don't think that the concern is applicable in the PMIPv6 P2P link
context. That is why I was fine with either of the methods for getting
the IID.

Thanks
Suresh
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf