ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Last Call <draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt> (The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM) to Informational RFC

2011-10-12 07:15:50
Snipped, comment inline


You are making a point on which I picked earlier because it is stated
in the
document as well. In case there are multiple solutions, documenting,
but at
the same time discouraging the other one has happened before. Why is
this not
possible in this case? Make one the default, the other optional with
a big
red warning sign.

Best,
Rolf

This is indeed possible in this case. It has been privately suggested
multiple times, but
I agree that this should have been publicly suggested as well (and thus
I guess that I am
publicly suggesting it now).

Ross
[JD] 

How does the IETF put a big red warning sign on a document produced by another 
standards body?

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>