I notice that e-mail via this ietf list is being delayed with respect to mail to
a working group list at or around the time of DKIM processing.
Thus to the mpls list, the mail travels at the speed of light
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 9417311E80A5; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:49:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1;
<snip>
X-Original-To: mpls(_at_)ietfa(_dot_)amsl(_dot_)com
Delivered-To: mpls(_at_)ietfa(_dot_)amsl(_dot_)com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 5F60B11E8098; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
whereas to the ietf list, it is delayed by the best part of a day.
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B1B21F8C11; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 08:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1;
<snip>
X-Original-To: ietf(_at_)ietfa(_dot_)amsl(_dot_)com
Delivered-To: ietf(_at_)ietfa(_dot_)amsl(_dot_)com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 5F60B11E8098; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
It does make following a thread challenging, getting the answers the day before
the question, when some use the WG list and others do not. Is this another
benefit of DKIM:-)
Tom Petch
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf