Randy,
I was the source of the request that started all this, so you can
blame me! Of course, if you have replied a bit earlier, we could have
discussed this over lunch yesterday! :-)
Cheers,
Andy
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Ronald Bonica <rbonica(_at_)juniper(_dot_)net>
wrote:
Randy,
Reclassifying old documents to historic is like cleaning your attic. Cleaning
the attic may seem like a terrible waste of time and effort while you are
doing it, but it makes your life much easier the next time you have to find
or store something up there.
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
Randy Bush
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 2:47 PM
To: Frank Ellermann
Cc: IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: Last Calls: [SOME RFCs] to HISTORIC RFCs
we don't have enough real work to do?
Clean up is necessary work. Some hours ago
I tried to understand a discussion about the
"ISE" (independent stream), and gave up on
it when the maze of updates obsoleting RFCs
which updated other RFCs turned out to be
as complex as the colossal cave adventure.
QED
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf