----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronald Bonica" <rbonica(_at_)juniper(_dot_)net>
To: "Randy Bush" <randy(_at_)psg(_dot_)com>; "Frank Ellermann"
<hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
Cc: "IETF Discussion" <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 9:56 PM
Randy,
Reclassifying old documents to historic is like cleaning your attic. Cleaning
the attic may seem like a terrible waste of time and effort while you are doing
it, but it makes your life much easier the next time you have to find or store
something up there.
Ron
Ron,
Given the time that has elapsed since this list last discussed Historicising, I
had almost forgotten that I read the message below; that seemed a good statement
then and seems a good one now.
"Folks,
After reading responses from Scott, John and Keith, I think that I get it. No
matter how low hanging I believe the fruit to be, this isn't going to be cheap
or easy. So, I withdraw the proposal and apologize to Mykyta for having wasted
his time.
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: t.petch [mailto:daedulus(_at_)btconnect(_dot_)com]
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 10:24 AM
To: Cyrus Daboo
Cc: IETF Discussion; Keith Moore; Ronald Bonica
Subject: Re: Pre-IETF RFCs to Historic (not really proposing)
"
======================================================
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of
Randy Bush
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 2:47 PM
To: Frank Ellermann
Cc: IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: Last Calls: [SOME RFCs] to HISTORIC RFCs
we don't have enough real work to do?
Clean up is necessary work. Some hours ago
I tried to understand a discussion about the
"ISE" (independent stream), and gave up on
it when the maze of updates obsoleting RFCs
which updated other RFCs turned out to be
as complex as the colossal cave adventure.
QED
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf