Dear Jari,
Am 03.11.2011 um 12:29 schrieb Jari Arkko:
Ralph,
This document calls for the assignment of a new HIP Packet Type from the HIP
Packet Type registry,
http://www.iana.org/assignments/hip-parameters/hip-parameters.xml Assignment
of HIP Packet Types requires IETF consensus. The purpose of this last call
is to assess IETF consensus for the assignment described in the document.
I support this action.
RFC 5201 defines the rules for the registry. I would like to request that RFC
5201bis http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-07#section-9
would use "IETF Review or IESG Approval" rule as opposed to just saying "IETF
Review".
I will make the change as requested.
Best regards,
Tobias
--
Dipl.-Inform. Tobias Heer, Ph.D. Student
Chair of Communication and Distributed Systems - comsys
RWTH Aachen University, Germany
tel: +49 241 80 207 76
web: http://www.comsys.rwth-aachen.de/team/tobias-heer/
blog: http://dtobi.wordpress.com/
card: http://card.ly/dtobi
pgp id: AEECA5BF
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf