+1
I also wonder how the ADs manage to read the documents for their own WGs when
the agendas are this late. It's a lot of reading.
On Nov 7, 2011, at 11:24 PM, SM wrote:
Hello,
"Since it is important that working group members have adequate time to
review all documents", it would be good if relevant WG documents are made
available at least two weeks before the start of the WG session. Could the
IESG "please do something" so that participants have adequate time to review
such documents?
The following WGs have not published any agenda yet:
1. RADEXT
2. SOFTWIRE
3. OPSEC
4. CUSS
cuss - got canceled ....
5. FORCES
6. TSVWG
7. OPSAWG
8. IDR
9. PPSP
10. PKIX
11. REPUTE (new WG)
12. MBONED
13. CONEX
14. TICTOC
15. ANCP
16. GROW
17. LISP
18. MULTRANS (BoF)
19. KRB-WG
Will the above sessions, excluding exceptional cases, be cancelled?
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf