ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Gen-ART Combined Last Call and Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc1948bis-01

2011-12-08 02:31:21
Hi, Ben,

Thanks so much for your review! (and my appologies for the delay in my
response). PLease find my comments inline...


On 11/01/2011 04:55 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:

Minor issues:

-- section 3, paragraph after ISN formula: "It is vital that F not be
computable…"

If it's vital for security reasons, it seems like this would be
worthy of normative language.

Agreed. (good grief!)



-- Appendix B, Removal of "A Common TCP Bug" section:

Can you comment on why the section was removed?

Yes: it was argued that this information was historical data, and that
if anybody wanted/needed to take a look, they could look at the original
RFC1948.

FWIW, I would have left this section in... but the wg had a different
opinion...



Nits/editorial comments:

-- abstract

The abstract should explicitly mention the update to RFC793

Done.



-- section 1, 2nd paragraph:

Please expand ISN on first mention

Done.



-- informative references:

Is there any way to avoid orphaning the last reference fragment? It's
confusing to find half a reference at the top of the next page.

I'm sure the RFC-Editor will take care of this.

P.S.: (All my "done", "fixed", etc., are subject to the documents
shepard's agreement ;-) )

Thanks!

Best regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando(_at_)gont(_dot_)com(_dot_)ar || 
fgont(_at_)si6networks(_dot_)com
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Gen-ART Combined Last Call and Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc1948bis-01, Fernando Gont <=