Errata 2684 was entered against RFC 5226, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA
Considerations Section in RFCs". After discussion with one of the RFC authors
and IANA staff, I rejected the errata.
The errata author is saying that in many registries, there are no "unreserved"
values. For registries where there are a finite number of entries possible,
the "unreserved" has a clear meaning. For registries with an unbounded number
of potential entries (such as media-types), the errata author is claiming that
the "unreserved" label does not make sense.
I'd like to know what others think about this errata.
Russ
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf