ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected

2011-12-08 13:19:51
On 12/8/11 12:18 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:

That said, the best I can see for this report is "held for document
update."  It's one of those things that's not worth spending time on,
and, as Thomas says, the "should" language makes it fine as it is.

+1. There's work happening in the background on 5226bis. Let those
authors sort it out. :)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf