Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected

ietf

Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected

2011-12-08 13:27:31

In other words, I don't see a problem with the existing text that
warrants bothering with an errata.


If IANA isn't able to figure out what they need to do under the
current wording, we have problems that no amount of word twiddling can
fix.

R's,
John

PS: The last time I checked, it wasn't a problem.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Errata against RFC 5226 rejected, Russ Housley Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected, Thomas Narten RE: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected, Benson Schliesser Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected, John Levine <= Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected, John C Klensin Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected, Barry Leiba Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected, Peter Saint-Andre Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected, Stewart Bryant Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected, Barry Leiba Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected, Fred Baker Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected, Stewart Bryant

Previous by Date:	Re: IAOC Member Selection, IETF Chair
Next by Date:	Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected, Fred Baker
Previous by Thread:	Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected, Benson Schliesser
Next by Thread:	Re: Errata against RFC 5226 rejected, John C Klensin
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]