At 14:58 07-02-2012, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'IETF meeting attendees' Frequently Asked (travel) Questions'
<draft-george-travel-faq-03.txt> as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2012-03-06. Exceptionally, comments
may be
In Section 1:
"more efficiently than waiting until someone sends an email to the
XXattendees(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org list in the days leading up to the meeting."
The XX is ambiguous.
In Section 2:
"Therefore, this document is intended to be something that can be
provided to host event organizers that may not have much familiarity
with the IETF, so that they have a better sense of the information
that attendees will find helpful."
The draft is written from am IETF perspective for an IETF audience.
Does http://wikitravel.org/en/Paris provide answers to some of the
questions in this draft?
"In reading this document, one may ask, "why would such a
technologically advanced and internet-savvy organization need such
help? Isn't that why search engines exist?" And the answer is that
yes, we can sometimes find what we're looking for with search
engines, but that results in hundreds of people spending their time
searching, which is not very efficient. In addition, despite the"
If hundreds of people spent their time searching, there would have
been more information on
http://www.ietf.org/registration/MeetingWiki/wiki/doku.php Or is it
not efficient for people to share the information they have found?
The following people have contributed to the ietf83 section:
Kevin P. Fleming
Stephanie McCammon
Amy Vezza
Iljitsch van Beijnum
Scott Brim
"no matter how good online translation is getting, some of the most
informative sites may be difficult for non-native speakers to"
Is this about informative sites being difficult for non-native
speakers or for people from a specific part of the world? I suggest
that the author seeks feedback from people who use English as a
second language.
Visa requirements is a one-liner whereas food considerations are
discussed in several paragraphs. Section 3.3 is labelled
International considerations. The entire document is about
international considerations.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf