To the addressed folks who's messages appear below:
I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. There was some objection
at the beginning of this thread by Wes George, Noel Chiappa, and Brian
Carpenter. I agreed that the document could be misunderstood as
encouraging the use of the space as 1918 space and proposed some
replacement text. There seemed to be some agreement around that text.
Are you now objecting to that replacement text and want -14 published as
is? Do you think the document should say that the new allocation can be
used as 1918 space? If so, please explain.
Not sure how a +1 to a statement saying "I support this updated draft, and I
am keen for this to be published as a BCP." can be interpreted in any but one
way, or for that matter how it can be stated much differently.
Anyway, to use different words, I would like to see the current draft
approved and published as a BCP. Clear enough?
Ned
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf