-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Barnes [mailto:rbarnes(_at_)bbn(_dot_)com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 5:45 PM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: A nuance of interoperability reports
Seems like it depends on your definitions of "abusive" and
"legitimate". Do you have an example?
For a contrived example, let's say a registered HTTP header field that's only
ever found to be present in web pages used by bad actors, but lots of them.
Then HTTPbis comes up for standards track advancement and they're cleaning out
the cruft. Would marking that field as deprecated or removing it completely be
justified?
-MSK
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf