On 02/24/2012 07:38, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:54:32PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <4F46BFDF(_dot_)3070703(_at_)dougbarton(_dot_)us>, Doug Barton
writes:
2782 was published 12 years ago this month. I suppose it can be
considered mature enough to deploy at this point? :)
+1000
Over in spfbis, people are arguing that the SPF RRTYPE should be
deprecated and abandoned in SPF because nobody uses it because of
practical difficulties in getting new RRTYPEs deployed. What makes us
think that the arguments in favour of SRV are going to find more
fertile ground?
Because I emphasized the point that SRV has been around for 12 years? I
have enough experience to know how difficult it is to deploy new RRs.
SRV is not new.
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf