On 2/24/2012 7:35 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
On Feb 24, 2012, at 7:39 PM, Joe Touch <touch(_at_)isi(_dot_)edu
<mailto:touch(_at_)isi(_dot_)edu>> wrote:
OK, so although I disagree that this is the correct procedure, if it's
typical for DHCP then that's reasonable.
So just to be clear here, it seems that you are withdrawing your request
that we create a new IANA registry and to say that this document updates
RFC2131 or RFC2132, right?
I made an observation and a suggestion about those issues. They are not
transport issues, so I consider them individual position only, and defer
to the WG on how to proceed.
Joe
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf