I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.
Document: draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-09
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date:2012-3-13
IETF LC End Date: 2012-3-28
IESG Telechat date:
Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a standard track RFC.
Major issues:
Minor issues:
1. In section 4.2 "In absence of both the MT-PRIORITY MAIL FROM
parameter and the MT-Priority header field, other message header fields,
such as Priority [RFC2156] and X-Priority, MAY be used for determining the
priority under this "Priority Message Handling" SMTP extension." . My
understanding from the third bullet in this section is that for this case
the message priority is "0" so I am not clear what this sentence means and
why is there a difference if the MT-PRIORITY or MT-Priority values do exist
with regards to "Priority" and "X-Priority" for this case.
2. In section 8 "MT-PRIORITY=3". I did not see where the MT-PRIORITY
SMTP extension is specified and has the syntax of using "=" before the
value.
Nits/editorial comments:
1. MUA is used in section 1 but expanded only in section 5.
2. Some typos in section 5. "syntatically - syntactically" "prioritiy
- priority" "comminicate - communicate" "contraints -constraints"
3. In section 10 for X.3.TBD3 "Description: The message mas accepted"
I assume you meant "was"
4. In section D.2 first paragraph some typos "focusses -focuses"
"comparision - comparison"
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf