Works for me also...
Thanks!
Joe Pelissier
-----Original Message-----
From: Pat Thaler [mailto:pthaler(_at_)broadcom(_dot_)com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:24 PM
To: Stewart Bryant (stbryant); Joe Pelissier (jopeliss)
Cc: nvo3(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; IETF Discussion
Subject: RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) -
25-Apr-2012 update
Yes
-----Original Message-----
From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:59 PM
To: Pat Thaler; jopeliss(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com
Cc: nvo3(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) -
25-Apr-2012 update
Does deleting "IETF" in the following
sentence:
"Any documented solutions
will use existing IETF protocols if suitable."
satisfy your concerns?
- Stewart