So perhaps if Randy's new suggested boilerplate could be added as
an erratum to 2119
yikes! i did not intend that. and i think folk need to look up
'erratum', think trivial bug fix. this would be a change. and i do
not have the hubris to change sob's immortal words :)
i think the practical problem my text may hit is id-nits and id nit
pickers. two friends have warned me that i may have fun getting a
draft through the iesg with it, and that i can look forward to
silliness. my read of the iesg is that they have been taking a
higher road these years. but we'll see.
randy