--On Friday, July 06, 2012 00:28 -0400 Tony Hansen
<tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com> wrote:
Authoritative, no. But definitely referenced by many, many
people and IMO worthy of a certain amount of care.
No disagreement about care. But it seems to me that adequate
care requires keeping track of a future version, a current
version, and a previous version (or maybe two). The ability to
easily find and trace back through the entire history of the
document seems appropriate for something normative but well
beyond what is required for reasonable care with a document like
this.
Just my opinion, however. I have trouble convincing myself that
the issue is really important enough to hold things up.
john