On 9/27/2012 10:57 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
As for the earlier discussion seeking to exclude paid staff, I
think it odd to have criteria that would permit /any/ paid staff to
sit on Nomcom. We pay for a number of folk 'staff' folk to show up
and IETF meetings and none of them should qualify for Nomcom, IMO.
...
(2) Looking at the history
(https://www.ietf.org/nomcom/committee.html), it does not seem that
there has been an issue of 'staff' seeking NomCom spots. Prior to
IETF Last Call, a previous version of this document was discussed on
this mail list and on the ietf-nomcom mailing list. It was also
discussed by a design team made up of ex-NomCom Chairs, My sense of
those discussions is to exclude as few people as necessary to avoid a
self-selecting leadership, and the current document reflects that
perspective.
So, to provide a specific example, you would be OK with having someone
from AMS on Nomcom?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net