Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL

ietf

Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL

2012-11-12 17:23:29



On 11/12/2012 9:52 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:

I think you miss the point of "This summary is only meant to point you in the
right direction, and doesn't have all the nuances. The IETF's IPR Policy is set
forth in BCP 79; please read it carefully."



as in 1.c of the doc, I believe.

d/


--
 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 bbiw.net

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, (continued) Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, tglassey Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, John C Klensin Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL/ NEA IPR issues..., tglassey RE: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, George, Wes Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, Eric Burger Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, tglassey RE: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, Lawrence Rosen Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, bill manning Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, Dave Crocker RE: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, Adrian Farrel Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, Dave Crocker <=

Previous by Date:	Re: in-person vs remote participation (was: Newcomers [Was: Evolutionizing the IETF]), Michael Richardson
Next by Date:	NASA just bought IRTF, Stephane Bortzmeyer
Previous by Thread:	RE: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL, Adrian Farrel
Next by Thread:	Re: [Fecframe] Last Call: <draft-ietf-fecframe-simple-rs-04.txt> (Simple Reed-Solomon Forward Error Correction (FEC) Scheme for FECFRAME) to Proposed Standard, Vincent Roca
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]