Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG

ietf

Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG

2013-02-03 15:24:23

On 03/02/2013 21:17, joel jaeggli wrote:

Having responded to an appeal associated with handling of a WG document,
there can easily be 2000k worth of messages sitting in the archives arcoss
multiple lists for a given document.


I forsee many phds for future anthropologists and social historians.

Nick

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, (continued) Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, Hector Santos Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, t.p. Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, t.p. Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, Eliot Lear Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, John C Klensin Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, Andrew Sullivan Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, SM Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, Lixia Zhang Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, Scott Brim Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, joel jaeggli Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, Nick Hilliard <= Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, joel jaeggli Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, Abdussalam Baryun

Previous by Date:	Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, joel jaeggli
Next by Date:	Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, joel jaeggli
Previous by Thread:	Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, joel jaeggli
Next by Thread:	Re: History of protocol discussion or process in WG, joel jaeggli
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]