petition process: Create a Request for Comment (RFC) process similar to
the
IETF's for taking in suggestions for innovation from public.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ideal would be "SharkTank". But that is bound to be difficult at a
national level.
(SharkTank is something we are doing in my org in my employer.. I make
trouble everywhere, not just in public forums.. Intrapreneur is what
they politely are calling people like me now apparently... Chief
troublemaker is how I refer to it)..
Sam Crooks
Scrooks(_at_)microsoft(_dot_)com
Sent from my Windows Phone From: Joe Abley
Sent: =E2=80=8E3/=E2=80=8E8/=E2=80=8E2013 12:21 PM
To: Richard Barnes
Cc: Sam Crooks; khomme(_at_)salesforce(_dot_)com;
patrick(_dot_)gallagher(_at_)nist(_dot_)gov;
case_cole(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)com; ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [IETF] Petition for "We the People" US Federal Government
petition process: Create a Request for Comment (RFC) process similar to
the IETF's for taking in suggestions for innovation from public.
On 2013-03-08, at 14:09, Richard Barnes <rlb(_at_)ipv(_dot_)sx> wrote:
I think you may be over-estimating the filtering power of the Internet-Dr=
aft system.
Perhaps the implication is that if the Whitehouse were to insist upon a 197=
0s publication format and employed an array of tools to reject submissions =
based on formatting errors, only the most persistent trolls would get throu=
gh?
Joe
(running away now)