ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first

2013-04-06 12:47:44
On 4/6/13, Warren Kumari <warren(_at_)kumari(_dot_)net> wrote:
-very, very, very lots.

I understand you may have missed the fact that an RFC was an April 1st, and
are grumpy now, but that's no reason to ruin things for the rest of us...

Try hacking protocol, not policy -- then folk may listen more to your
proposals on things.

A message today may not be listened to but in future it may be listen
to. I just commented and replied to special publication RFC, does that
ruin things for you? do you/us own the policy. If IETF does not listen
to proposals on the list, then what is it about, do you mean folks
don't listen to only specific people's proposals? I think me or you
don't know how IETF works,

AB

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>