Salvatore
Dear all,
A new version of the Internet Draft on Flow Selection Techniques has
been submitted. It contains the following changes:
-A new section illustrating the difference between Intermediate Flow
Selection Process and Intermediate Selection Process has been added,
-The sentence "In order to be compliant with this document, at least
the Property Match Filtering MUST be implemented." has been removed
in Section 1,
-“MUST” has been replaced with “SHOULD” in Section 5.1,
Actually, the feedback was:
In Section 1:
"In order to be compliant with this document, at least the Property
Match Filtering MUST be implemented."
The above text is repeated in Section 5.1. I suggest removing this
sentence as it does not seem related to scope.
My reading of the "MUST" is that it is being used for compliance
instead of the reasons described in RFC 2119. I suggest reviewing
the usage of RFC 2119 key words in Section 5.1.
So the solution is not to change MUST to SHOULD.
The question is whether "MUST" versus "must" must be used.
I understand the concern. For compliance reason with the PSAMP RFC 5475
(which is closely related) ...
7 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5475#section-7>. Parameters for
the Description of Selection Techniques
This section gives an overview of different alternative selection
schemes and their required parameters. In order to be compliant with
PSAMP, at least one of proposed schemes MUST be implemented.
... I would keep the initial "MUST" from the previous draft version.
-“The flowSelectorAlgorithm registry is maintained by IANA." has been
replaced with “IANA is requested to create the flowSelectorAlgorithm
registry.”
-The sentence "The registry can be updated when specifications of the
new technique(s) and any new Information Elements are provided." has
been removed since it did not clarify how the registry will be managed.
- Section 6.1.1 “Property Match Filtering” has been changed by adding
some text on how Property Match Filtering can be used by an
Intermediate Flow Selection Process in the Metering Process, in the
Exporting Process and within an IPFIX Mediator.
When publishing a new version, please correct this editorial issue.
" ... and Flow duration. in
the An example is the selection of the largest ..."
Best regards,
Salvatore
*Da:*Benoit Claise [mailto:bclaise(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com]
*Inviato:* lunedì 8 aprile 2013 15:21
*A:* draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org
*Cc:* ipfix-chairs(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org
*Oggetto:* Fwd: Last Call Expired:
<draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt>
Dear authors,
The IETF last call has finished.
Can you please update your draft based on the feedback received.
Then I will progress it.
Regards, Benoit
-------- Original Message --------
*Subject: *
Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt>
*Date: *
Mon, 01 Apr 2013 00:28:46 -0700
*From: *
DraftTracker Mail System <iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
<mailto:iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
*To: *
iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org <mailto:iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>, ipfix-chairs(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org
<mailto:ipfix-chairs(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org>,
draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org
<mailto:draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org>
*CC: *
iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org <mailto:iesg-secretary(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Please DO NOT reply to this email.
I-D: <draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech-14.txt>
ID Tracker
URL:http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipfix-flow-selection-tech/
IETF Last Call has ended, and the state has been changed to
Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nessun virus nel messaggio.
Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Versione: 2013.0.3272 / Database dei virus: 3162/6231 - Data di
rilascio: 07/04/2013
*******************************************************************************************************
IL MERITO DEGLI STUDENTI VIENE RICONOSCIUTO
Il 5 per mille all'Università degli Studi di Napoli
"Parthenope"incrementa le borse di studio agli studenti - codice
fiscale *80018240632*
_http://www.uniparthenope.it/index.php/5xmille_
_http://www.uniparthenope.it/index.php/it/avvisi-sito-di-ateneo/2943-la-parthenope-premia-il-tuo-voto-di-diploma-ed-il-tuo-imegno-con-i-proventi-del-5-per-mille_
Questa informativa è inserita in automatico dal sistema al fine
esclusivo della realizzazione dei fini istituzionali dell'ente.
*******************************************************************************************************
IL MERITO DEGLI STUDENTI VIENE RICONOSCIUTO
Il 5 per mille all'Università degli Studi di Napoli
"Parthenope"incrementa le borse di studio agli studenti - codice
fiscale *80018240632*
_http://www.uniparthenope.it/index.php/5xmille_
_http://www.uniparthenope.it/index.php/it/avvisi-sito-di-ateneo/2943-la-parthenope-premia-il-tuo-voto-di-diploma-ed-il-tuo-imegno-con-i-proventi-del-5-per-mille_
Questa informativa è inserita in automatico dal sistema al fine
esclusivo della realizzazione dei fini istituzionali dell'ente.