On May 3, 2013, at 12:21 PM, Scott Kitterman <scott(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com>
wrote:
On Friday, May 03, 2013 12:04:53 PM Douglas Otis wrote:
...
Over many years at attempting to change the course of the SPF process, this
effort appears to have been futile.
...
It does seem a bit odd for you to claim you're being ignored when the largest
change in SPF processing limits contained in 4408bis was your suggestion. An
alternate interpretation to consider is that the working group fully
considered your inputs and incorporated those that were appropriate
technically and in scope for the charter.
Dear Scott,
This was not directly part of the IETF process, as my input there was ignored.
As I recall, removal of unlimited recursion occurred after a presentation made
in Boston to the Open Group.
As with unlimited recursion, the need for the macro functions are also
negligible while posing real risks. This is a serious security concern still
needing to be addressed.
Regards,
Douglas Otis