IETF Discussion (date)
May 31, 2013
- Re: Not Listening to the Ops Customer (was Re: Issues in wider geographic participation), Masataka Ohta, 23:45
- Re: Not Listening to the Ops Customer, Brian E Carpenter, 23:35
- Re: Not Listening to the Ops Customer (was Re: Issues in wider geographic participation), John C Klensin, 22:01
- Re: Time in the Air, Ted Lemon, 21:17
- Re: Time in the Air, Ted Lemon, 21:10
- Re: [IETF] Not Listening to the Ops Customer (was Re: Issues in wider geographic participation), Masataka Ohta, 20:47
- Re: [IETF] Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Warren Kumari, 20:21
- Re: [IETF] Not Listening to the Ops Customer (was Re: Issues in wider geographic participation), Warren Kumari, 20:14
- Re: Time in the Air, Randy Bush, 19:49
- Re: Time in the Air, Fred Baker (fred), 19:44
- Re: Time in the Air, Mark Nottingham, 19:33
- Re: Not Listening to the Ops Customer (was Re: Issues in wider geographic participation), manning bill, 19:28
- Not Listening to the Ops Customer (was Re: Issues in wider geographic participation), Randy Bush, 19:23
- Re: Time in the Air, Mark Nottingham, 19:02
- RE: [IETF] Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, John C Klensin, 18:51
- Re: Time in the Air, Elwyn Davies, 15:32
- Re: [IETF] RE: Time in the Air, Carlos M. Martinez, 14:57
- Re: [IETF] Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Randy Bush, 14:56
- Re: "Hands across the water/hands across the sky", Carsten Bormann, 14:55
- Re: Time in the Air, joel jaeggli, 14:25
- Re: "Hands across the water/hands across the sky", Abdussalam Baryun, 14:24
- Re: Time in the Air, Scott Brim, 14:18
- Re: Time in the Air, Dave Crocker, 13:55
- Re: [IETF] Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Warren Kumari, 13:44
- Appointment of Bob Hinden to Another Term on the ISOC Board of Trustees, IAB Chair, 13:34
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Jorge Amodio, 13:26
- Re: [IETF] RE: Time in the Air, Jorge Amodio, 13:24
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Carlos M. Martinez, 13:15
- Re: [IETF] RE: Time in the Air, Carlos M. Martinez, 13:13
- Re: Time in the Air, Scott Brim, 13:12
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Jorge Amodio, 13:07
- Congratulations Bob Hinden!, Edwin A. Opare, 13:06
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Carlos M. Martinez, 12:55
- Re: [IETF] RE: Time in the Air, Warren Kumari, 12:48
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, John C Klensin, 11:36
- NOMCOM 2013 - validated volunteers so far, Mankin, Allison, 10:24
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps-05, Simo.Veikkolainen, 10:19
- RE: [Pce] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-07.txt> (Requirements for GMPLS applications of PCE) to Informational RFC, Ogaki, Kenichi, 10:18
- "Hands across the water/hands across the sky", Spencer Dawkins, 09:54
- Re: Time in the Air, Ted Lemon, 09:36
- Re: Time in the Air, Riccardo Bernardini, 09:19
- RE: Time in the Air, l.wood, 09:08
- Re: [IETF] Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Randy Bush, 08:35
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Arturo Servin, 08:01
- Re: Time in the Air, Dave Cridland, 07:55
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Scott Brim, 07:53
- Re: Time in the Air, Carsten Bormann, 07:39
- Re: Time in the Air, Mark Nottingham, 06:02
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Fernando Gont, 05:53
- Re: Time in the Air, Fernando Gont, 05:28
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, t.p., 05:25
- Time in the Air, Mark Nottingham, 04:59
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Abdussalam Baryun, 01:36
May 30, 2013
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Abdussalam Baryun, 23:59
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: "Fixing: the standards track or RFC series (was: Re: What do we mean when we standardize something?), Abdussalam Baryun, 23:37
- Re: [IETF] Issues in wider geographic participation, Douglas Otis, 21:53
- Re: [IETF] Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Melinda Shore, 21:41
- RE: [IETF] Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, l.wood, 21:24
- Re: [IETF] Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Randy Presuhn, 21:16
- Re: [IETF] Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Melinda Shore, 21:09
- RE: [IETF] Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Adrian Farrel, 20:19
- Re: [IETF] Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, John C Klensin, 19:37
- Re: [IETF] Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Warren Kumari, 14:32
- Re: What do we mean when we standardize something?, SM, 12:45
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Thomas Narten, 12:41
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, John C Klensin, 12:25
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Paul Hoffman, 10:00
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Randy Bush, 08:31
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Randy Bush, 08:17
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Michael Richardson, 08:11
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Roque Gagliano (rogaglia), 06:16
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, SM, 03:34
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Dave Crocker, 03:06
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Melinda Shore, 02:58
- RE: When to adopt a WG I-D, Adrian Farrel, 02:57
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Dave Crocker, 02:24
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Melinda Shore, 02:19
- RE: When to adopt a WG I-D, Adrian Farrel, 02:17
- Aw: What do we mean when we standardize something?, Hannes Tschofenig, 02:12
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Mark Nottingham, 02:07
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Melinda Shore, 02:07
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Jari Arkko, 02:06
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Jari Arkko, 01:57
- RE: When to adopt a WG I-D, Adrian Farrel, 01:54
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, John C Klensin, 01:05
- "Fixing: the standards track or RFC series (was: Re: What do we mean when we standardize something?), John C Klensin, 00:10
May 29, 2013
- RE: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, l.wood, 20:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley, 20:35
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Abdussalam Baryun, 20:16
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Mark Nottingham, 19:46
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Abdussalam Baryun, 19:40
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, George Michaelson, 18:29
- DKIM promotion to Internet Standard status, Hector Santos, 17:59
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 17:51
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 17:23
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, SM, 16:56
- Oooops CORRECTION Reply to This - Re: Nomcom 2013-14 Volunteering - 2nd Call, Mankin, Allison, 16:09
- Nomcom 2013-14 Volunteering - 2nd Call, Mankin, Allison, 16:06
- Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-forces-interop-08, Ben Campbell, 15:46
- Re: What do we mean when we standardize something?, Brian E Carpenter, 15:45
- Re: What do we mean when we standardize something?, Dave Cridland, 15:05
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Joe Touch, 14:51
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley, 14:35
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Dave Crocker, 13:57
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Arturo Servin, 13:40
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-miscellaneous-caps-05, Roni Even, 13:14
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Joe Touch, 13:00
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Dave Crocker, 12:52
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Joe Touch, 12:45
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Paul Hoffman, 12:44
- Re: What do we mean when we standardize something?, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:42
- Re: What do we mean when we standardize something?, Melinda Shore, 12:38
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Dave Crocker, 12:36
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Joe Touch, 12:32
- What do we mean when we standardize something?, John C Klensin, 12:25
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Ted Lemon, 11:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 11:37
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 11:26
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America (off-topic), S Moonesamy, 11:08
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, John C Klensin, 10:35
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Jari Arkko, 10:21
- financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Ines Robles, 10:03
- IETF Meeting in South America, Ines Robles, 10:02
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Patrik Fältström, 06:40
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, John C Klensin, 06:32
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, John C Klensin, 06:19
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Jorge Amodio, 05:52
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Eggert, Lars, 04:54
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Abdussalam Baryun, 04:19
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions (was: IETF Meeting in South America), Abdussalam Baryun, 04:00
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Abdussalam Baryun, 03:49
- RE: IETF Meeting in South America, S Moonesamy, 03:41
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Patrik Fältström, 01:37
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Yoav Nir, 01:27
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Jorge Amodio, 00:28
- RE: IETF Meeting in South America, GT RAMIREZ, Medel G., 00:10
May 28, 2013
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, George Michaelson, 23:51
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, I rob, 23:26
- IETF Meeting in South America, I rob, 23:17
- RE: IETF Meeting in South America, l.wood, 22:21
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Arturo Servin, 22:09
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Mark Andrews, 21:52
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Melinda Shore, 21:48
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Juliao Braga, 21:39
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Arturo Servin, 21:28
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Melinda Shore, 21:09
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, Juliao Braga, 20:51
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, Alejandro Acosta, 20:15
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Arturo Servin, 18:59
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Juliao Braga, 18:45
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush, 18:44
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Arturo Servin, 18:36
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Juliao Braga, 18:32
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, joel jaeggli, 18:15
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Arturo Servin, 18:10
- RE: IETF Meeting in South America, l.wood, 18:06
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Juliao Braga, 17:13
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Arturo Servin, 16:32
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Fernando Gont, 16:19
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Brian E Carpenter, 15:26
- Re: WebRTC and emergency communications (Was: Re: IETF Meeting in South America), Ted Hardie, 14:00
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Christian O'Flaherty, 13:56
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Christian O'Flaherty, 13:39
- Re: WebRTC and emergency communications (Was: Re: IETF Meeting in South America), Paul Hoffman, 13:34
- Re: [Isoc-br] IETF Meeting in South America, Scott Brim, 13:33
- Re: WebRTC and emergency communications (Was: Re: IETF Meeting in South America), Richard Barnes, 13:25
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Juliao Braga, 13:22
- Re: WebRTC and emergency communications (Was: Re: IETF Meeting in South America), James Polk, 13:21
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Abdussalam Baryun, 12:46
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Spencer Dawkins, 12:43
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Carlos M. Martinez, 12:37
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, joel jaeggli, 12:35
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Fernando Gont, 12:32
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, SM, 12:17
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, joel jaeggli, 12:16
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Melinda Shore, 12:15
- Re: WebRTC and emergency communications (Was: Re: IETF Meeting in South America), Ted Hardie, 11:59
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 11:08
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, joel jaeggli, 10:52
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, manning bill, 10:39
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Joel M. Halpern, 10:22
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Lou Berger, 10:21
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Juliao Braga, 10:20
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush, 10:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 10:18
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Fernando Gont, 10:02
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Fernando Gont, 10:01
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Fernando Gont, 10:00
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Loa Andersson, 10:00
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Stewart Bryant, 09:52
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Abdussalam Baryun, 09:36
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Loa Andersson, 09:25
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Christian O'Flaherty, 09:20
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Andrew Sullivan, 09:00
- Re: [manet] Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-03.txt> (Security Threats for NHDP) to Informational RFC, Jiazi YI, 08:59
- Re: Re: More participation from under-represented regions (was: IETF Meeting in South America), Jiankang Yao, 08:59
- [Isoc-br] IETF Meeting in South America, Rogerio Mariano, 08:58
- Re: WebRTC and emergency communications (Was: Re: IETF Meeting in South America), Janet P Gunn, 08:56
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Ted Lemon, 08:01
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Eric Burger, 07:47
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Eliot Lear, 07:02
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush, 06:58
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource R ecords for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 06:57
- Re: When to adopt a WG I-D, Thomas Nadeau, 06:34
- RE: When to adopt a WG I-D, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 06:10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley, 05:12
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Nthabiseng Pule, 04:46
- When to adopt a WG I-D, Adrian Farrel, 04:33
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Rumbidzayi Gadhula, 03:27
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, SM, 02:38
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush, 01:42
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Dave Crocker, 01:30
May 27, 2013
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Donald Eastlake, 23:10
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, Jorge Amodio, 21:08
- Re: WebRTC and emergency communications (Was: Re: IETF Meeting in South America), Richard Barnes, 20:35
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, Juliao Braga, 20:34
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, Jorge Amodio, 19:58
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush, 18:54
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, Juliao Braga, 17:28
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Christian O'Flaherty, 16:39
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, Scott Brim, 16:31
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Scott Brim, 16:26
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, David Morris, 16:24
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Tim Chown, 16:14
- Re: WebRTC and emergency communications (Was: Re: IETF Meeting in South America), cb.list6, 14:29
- Re: [manet] Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-03.txt> (Security Threats for NHDP) to Informational RFC, Melinda Shore, 14:20
- Re: Last Call: <draft-eastlake-rfc5342bis-02.txt> (IANA Considerations and IETF Protocol and Documentation Usage for IEEE 802 Parameters) to Best Current Practice, Donald Eastlake, 14:14
- Re: [manet] Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-03.txt> (Security Threats for NHDP) to Informational RFC, Abdussalam Baryun, 13:39
- Re: [manet] Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-03.txt> (Security Threats for NHDP) to Informational RFC, Abdussalam Baryun, 13:21
- Re: WebRTC and emergency communications (Was: Re: IETF Meeting in South America), Henning Schulzrinne, 12:56
- Re: WebRTC and emergency communications (Was: Re: IETF Meeting in South America), Richard Barnes, 12:52
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, Juliao Braga, 11:41
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Arturo Servin, 11:37
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, John R Levine, 11:31
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Jorge Amodio, 11:28
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Arturo Servin, 11:24
- Re: WebRTC and emergency communications (Was: Re: IETF Meeting in South America), Henning Schulzrinne, 11:19
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Arturo Servin, 11:18
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Arturo Servin, 11:12
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Andy Bierman, 11:10
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, John R Levine, 10:49
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Eggert, Lars, 10:46
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Jorge Amodio, 10:42
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, joel jaeggli, 10:41
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, John R Levine, 10:37
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Yoav Nir, 10:16
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Michal Krsek, 10:15
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, SM, 09:26
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Dave Crocker, 09:24
- Re: [manet] Last Call: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-03.txt> (Security Threats for NHDP) to Informational RFC, Abdussalam Baryun, 09:14
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Yoav Nir, 09:13
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Abdussalam Baryun, 08:31
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Rumbidzayi Gadhula, 07:56
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Nthabiseng Pule, 07:34
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Scott Brim, 07:23
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Arturo Servin, 07:18
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Jari Arkko, 07:15
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Dave Crocker, 07:08
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Arturo Servin, 06:53
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Abdussalam Baryun, 05:54
- Re: Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Eggert, Lars, 05:52
- Participation per Region of Authoring IETF documents vs Marketing, Abdussalam Baryun, 05:11
- Fwd: [IRTF-Announce] Applied Networking Research Prize 2013 presentation at IETF-87, Eggert, Lars, 05:06
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, Edwin A. Opare, 05:01
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Jari Arkko, 03:08
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Tim Chown, 02:21
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Jorge Amodio, 01:22
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, SM, 01:21
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions (was: IETF Meeting in South America), SM, 01:21
- Re: Issues in wider geographic participation, Melinda Shore, 01:15
- Issues in wider geographic participation, John Levine, 00:53
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, joel jaeggli, 00:46
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, Juliao Braga, 00:31
May 26, 2013
- Re: financial fun with an IETF Meeting in South America, John Levine, 23:16
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Dave Crocker, 22:37
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Abdussalam Baryun, 20:12
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, Juliao Braga, 19:03
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, Abdussalam Baryun, 18:51
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions (was: IETF Meeting in South America), Abdussalam Baryun, 18:38
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, Randy Presuhn, 18:28
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, SM, 18:02
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF Meeting in South America, John C Klensin, 16:42
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, Edwin A. Opare, 15:59
- Re: More participation from under-represented regions, Melinda Shore, 15:44
- More participation from under-represented regions (was: IETF Meeting in South America), SM, 15:10
- Re: WebRTC and emergency communications (Was: Re: IETF Meeting in South America), Richard Barnes, 14:57
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Juliao Braga, 12:57
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Dave Crocker, 11:43
May 25, 2013
- Re: General Comment on AD Review or IESG Review, Abdussalam Baryun, 23:41
- General Comment on AD Review or IESG Review, Abdussalam Baryun, 13:32
- Re: WebRTC and emergency communications (Was: Re: IETF Meeting in South America), Abdussalam Baryun, 13:17
- Re: WebRTC and emergency communications (Was: Re: IETF Meeting in South America), John C Klensin, 09:19
- RE: [Pce] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-07.txt> (Requirements for GMPLS applications of PCE) to Informational RFC, Adrian Farrel, 05:20
- WebRTC and emergency communications (Was: Re: IETF Meeting in South America), Jari Arkko, 02:10
May 24, 2013
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, John Levine, 18:48
- Re: IETF Meeting in North America, John Levine, 18:39
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Vinayak Hegde, 18:24
- RE: IETF Meeting in South America, Pat Thaler, 17:27
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Ole Jacobsen, 15:07
- Re: [ericas] IETF Meeting in South America, Juliao Braga, 14:55
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, joel jaeggli, 14:30
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Doug Barton, 13:38
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, joel jaeggli, 13:30
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Doug Barton, 13:25
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, joel jaeggli, 13:22
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, James Polk, 13:21
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Arturo Servin, 13:09
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Richard Barnes, 13:06
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, joel jaeggli, 13:03
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Doug Barton, 12:43
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Melinda Shore, 12:39
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Arturo Servin, 12:34
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Ted Lemon, 12:31
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, t.p., 12:14
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Melinda Shore, 11:18
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Scott Brim, 11:11
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Lou Berger, 11:09
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Mikael Abrahamsson, 11:07
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Stephen Farrell, 10:50
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Yoav Nir, 10:31
- RE: IETF Meeting in South America, Sheng Jiang, 10:13
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Antonio M. Moreiras, 10:12
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, SM, 09:58
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Alejandro Acosta, 09:57
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Juliao Braga, 09:53
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Arturo Servin, 09:37
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Michael Richardson, 09:13
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Arturo Servin, 09:11
- RE: <draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-sec-threats-03.txt> (Security Threats for NHDP) to Informational RFC, Adrian Farrel, 05:07
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Jari Arkko, 01:24
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, SM, 01:07
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Fred Baker (fred), 00:18
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Mikael Abrahamsson, 00:05
May 23, 2013
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Mark Nottingham, 23:56
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Peter Saint-Andre, 23:16
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Fred Baker (fred), 23:11
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Jorge Amodio, 22:42
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Vinayak Hegde, 22:34
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, John Levine, 22:31
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, David Conrad, 22:03
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Melinda Shore, 21:44
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Juliao Braga, 21:38
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Melinda Shore, 20:46
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Juliao Braga, 20:35
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Mark Nottingham, 18:28
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Fred Baker (fred), 18:06
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Jari Arkko, 17:40
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Arturo Servin, 17:36
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Donald Eastlake, 17:29
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Arturo Servin, 16:23
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, John C Klensin, 15:56
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, John Levine, 15:22
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Melinda Shore, 14:40
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, John C Klensin, 14:16
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Behcet Sarikaya, 14:07
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Alia Atlas, 13:55
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Paul Hoffman, 13:18
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Simon Pietro Romano, 12:55
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, David Meyer, 12:53
- Re: IETF Meeting in South America, Andrew G. Malis, 12:24
- IETF Meeting in South America, The IAOC, 10:56
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, John C Klensin, 05:37
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Måns Nilsson, 02:42
May 22, 2013
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Mark Andrews, 21:50
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Donald Eastlake, 21:45
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Dale R. Worley, 21:05
- Re: Proposed Standards and Expert Review (was: Re: Last Call <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard)), Dale R. Worley, 21:04
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Mark Andrews, 18:42
- RE: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, SM, 17:49
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-forces-interop-07, Wang,Weiming, 10:40
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, John C Klensin, 09:01
- RE: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Moriarty, Kathleen, 07:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley, 07:31
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Yoav Nir, 07:30
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, John C Klensin, 07:11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush, 01:43
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush, 01:36
May 21, 2013
- Re: Proposed Standards and Expert Review (was: Re: Last Call <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard)), John C Klensin, 15:51
- Re: Proposed Standards and Expert Review, Randy Bush, 15:35
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-forces-interop-07, Ben Campbell, 15:34
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC), SM, 14:54
- Re: Proposed Standards and Expert Review (was: Re: Last Call <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard)), Olafur Gudmundsson, 14:42
- Re: Proposed Standards and Expert Review, Doug Barton, 14:27
- Re: Proposed Standards and Expert Review, Joe Abley, 14:25
- Re: Proposed Standards and Expert Review, Keith Moore, 14:09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 13:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 12:41
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, joel jaeggli, 12:35
- Proposed Standards and Expert Review (was: Re: Last Call <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard)), John C Klensin, 12:33
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:28
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC), Dave Crocker, 12:03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 11:51
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman, 11:31
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-forces-interop-07, Kentaro Ogawa, 11:27
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 11:23
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC), SM, 11:22
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC), SM, 11:21
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley, 11:09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman, 11:08
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Sam Hartman, 11:08
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Ray Bellis, 11:04
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 11:02
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley, 10:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 10:56
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley, 10:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 10:50
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, joel jaeggli, 10:46
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 10:40
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Randy Bush, 10:23
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 10:07
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley, 09:30
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 09:19
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Joe Abley, 09:04
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 08:36
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Mark Andrews, 07:37
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC), Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, 05:25
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC), Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, 05:00
- Re: IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC), Randy Bush, 04:58
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 04:08
- IETF, ICANN and Whois (Was Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC), Steve Crocker, 03:44
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, joel jaeggli, 01:38
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Mark Andrews, 01:03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Rob Austein, 00:04
May 20, 2013
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 23:48
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Mark Andrews, 21:45
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, manning bill, 21:42
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Mark Andrews, 21:20
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Donald Eastlake, 20:54
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Keith Moore, 20:46
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Brian E Carpenter, 20:43
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Paul Hoffman, 20:42
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Mark Andrews, 20:23
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 20:07
- Re: Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, manning bill, 19:38
- Deployment of standards compliant nameservers, Mark Andrews, 19:27
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, SM, 18:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Rob Austein, 18:49
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 17:01
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Brian E Carpenter, 15:08
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 14:18
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Donald Eastlake, 14:11
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, SM, 12:51
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, joel jaeggli, 11:56
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Andy Bierman, 11:55
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Andy Bierman, 11:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Barry Leiba, 11:31
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Donald Eastlake, 11:26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, Paul Hoffman, 11:24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 10:56
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, joel jaeggli, 09:53
- Re: Last Call: <draft-jabley-dnsext-eui48-eui64-rrtypes-03.txt> (Resource Records for EUI-48 and EUI-64 Addresses in the DNS) to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 09:18
May 17, 2013
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Keith Moore, 21:52
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Keith Moore, 21:30
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Keith Moore, 20:30
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 20:08
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, John C Klensin, 18:59
- Diameter Credit Control Application--Issue during CCR-Update, Kamal Kotecha, 16:31
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Yoav Nir, 15:37
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 15:14
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETFprocess], Dave Crocker, 13:12
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETFprocess], t.p., 12:34
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, John C Klensin, 12:24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, Randy Bush, 10:54
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Brian Haberman, 10:44
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Dave Crocker, 10:38
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Keith Moore, 09:22
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Keith Moore, 09:02
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Jari Arkko, 08:35
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, John Curran, 07:13
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Stephen Farrell, 04:33
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Yoav Nir, 04:32
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Yoav Nir, 04:31
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Yoav Nir, 04:19
May 16, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Keith Moore, 23:12
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-forces-interop-07, Wang,Weiming, 22:19
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Fred Baker (fred), 17:38
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Peter Saint-Andre, 17:12
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], joel jaeggli, 17:10
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Ralph Droms, 17:07
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Ralph Droms, 17:06
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Keith Moore, 16:58
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Ralph Droms, 16:56
- Re: APPSDIR review of draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01, Russ Housley, 16:22
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Brian E Carpenter, 16:04
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Fred Baker (fred), 16:00
- APPSDIR review of draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01, Tobias Gondrom, 15:57
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Stephen Farrell, 15:56
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Yoav Nir, 15:50
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], joel jaeggli, 15:49
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Scott Brim, 13:08
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Martin Rex, 13:06
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Ted Lemon, 12:14
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Dave Crocker, 12:01
- RE: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Adrian Farrel, 11:40
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Dave Crocker, 11:24
- Re: Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Dale R. Worley, 10:47
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Barry Leiba, 09:23
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Abdussalam Baryun, 09:11
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Abdussalam Baryun, 09:09
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Scott Brim, 09:08
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Loa Andersson, 08:56
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Abdussalam Baryun, 07:38
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ted Lemon, 07:23
- Re: article on innovation and open standards, Randy Bush, 02:52
- Re: Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Keith Moore, 01:20
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Keith Moore, 01:05
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, John C Klensin, 00:45
- Re: Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], John C Klensin, 00:08
May 15, 2013
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Keith Moore, 23:56
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Pete Resnick, 20:08
- Re: Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Edwin A. Opare, 19:14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, David Farmer, 18:51
- Re: Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Stephen Farrell, 18:34
- Re: Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Thomas Narten, 17:40
- RE: Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], l.wood, 17:35
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg-09, Peter Yee, 16:35
- Re: Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Doug Ewell, 16:28
- Re: Accessing tools from IETF pages, Andrew G. Malis, 16:25
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joe Touch, 15:51
- Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Ted Lemon, 15:39
- Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Adrian Farrel, 15:30
- Re: article on innovation and open standards, Dale R. Worley, 15:26
- Re: article on innovation and open standards, Dale R. Worley, 15:26
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Keith Moore, 15:24
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Keith Moore, 14:36
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joe Touch, 13:48
- Re: Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], John C Klensin, 13:38
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ted Lemon, 13:08
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, SM, 12:37
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joe Touch, 12:24
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ted Lemon, 12:15
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joe Touch, 11:37
- Re: Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Thomas Narten, 11:27
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Thomas Narten, 10:56
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Yoav Nir, 10:33
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Andy Bierman, 10:18
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Jari Arkko, 10:15
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Keith Moore, 10:06
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ted Lemon, 09:56
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ralph Droms, 09:50
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joe Touch, 09:49
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Keith Moore, 09:41
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joe Touch, 09:39
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joe Touch, 09:35
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joe Touch, 09:30
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joe Touch, 09:26
- Re: article on innovation and open standards, Keith Moore, 09:14
- Re: article on innovation and open standards, Mikael Abrahamsson, 09:00
- Re: article on innovation and open standards, Thierry Moreau, 08:01
- Re: article on innovation and open standards, Abdussalam Baryun, 07:30
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Jari Arkko, 05:52
- Re: article on innovation and open standards, Jari Arkko, 04:57
- Re: NomCom 2013-2014 Call for Volunteers - CORRECTED dates in first sentence, Abdussalam Baryun, 03:45
- Re: article on innovation and open standards, Keith Moore, 01:55
- Re: article on innovation and open standards, Mikael Abrahamsson, 01:42
- Re: article on innovation and open standards, Keith Moore, 01:26
- Re: article on innovation and open standards, Mikael Abrahamsson, 01:00
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Keith Moore, 00:06
May 14, 2013
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Keith Moore, 23:54
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Sam Hartman, 21:42
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ted Lemon, 19:53
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joe Touch, 19:29
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joel M. Halpern, 18:58
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Dave Crocker, 18:15
- Re: Review of: draft-otis-dkim-harmful, Douglas Otis, 18:04
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ted Lemon, 18:04
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Andrew Sullivan, 17:46
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Dave Crocker, 17:31
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ted Lemon, 17:12
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joel M. Halpern, 17:11
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joe Touch, 17:05
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joel M. Halpern, 17:01
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ted Lemon, 16:39
- Re: article on innovation and open standards, Andrew Sullivan, 16:32
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joe Touch, 16:17
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Stephen Farrell, 16:00
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joe Touch, 15:47
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Joe Touch, 15:47
- Re: article on innovation and open standards, Dale R. Worley, 15:38
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Brian E Carpenter, 15:10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, David Conrad, 13:32
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, David Farmer, 13:07
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Stephen Farrell, 12:45
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Dave Crocker, 12:19
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Cullen Jennings (fluffy), 11:56
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Carlos M. Martinez, 11:45
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ted Lemon, 11:34
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Cullen Jennings (fluffy), 08:58
- article on innovation and open standards, Jari Arkko, 04:11
May 13, 2013
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, SM, 23:35
- MalcolmBETTS90013533 is out of the office., Malcolm . BETTS, 15:01
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-forces-interop-07, Ben Campbell, 14:28
- Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt (updated for -07), Tim Chown, 12:37
- RE: Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt (updated for -07), Liubing (Leo), 09:06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, Tom Vest, 09:06
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, Tom Vest, 09:05
- Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt (updated for -07), Stig Venaas, 09:04
- Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01, Andy Bierman, 09:03
- Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01, Joel M. Halpern, 07:18
- Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 05:38
- Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01, Benoit Claise, 05:35
- Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01, Benoit Claise, 05:34
- Re: DKIM is Harmful as Specified, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:46
- Review of: draft-otis-dkim-harmful, Dave Crocker, 00:00
May 11, 2013
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, SM, 18:35
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, Brian E Carpenter, 15:14
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, SM, 10:39
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, Eliot Lear, 08:24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, Eliot Lear, 08:15
May 10, 2013
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, David Conrad, 20:36
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, cb.list6, 19:44
- Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt (updated for -07), Brian E Carpenter, 14:35
- Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt> (The Internet Numbers Registry System) to Informational RFC, SM, 13:51
- Re: Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt (updated for -07), Robert Sparks, 10:13
- Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01, Joel M. Halpern, 09:38
- ways forward with the tail-heavy aspects of the IETF process, Jari Arkko, 07:08
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Elwyn Davies, 04:46
- Re: Accessing tools from IETF pages, t.p., 03:19
May 09, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Update of draft-otis-ipv6-email-authent, Douglas Otis, 20:52
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Brian E Carpenter, 15:09
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, John C Klensin, 08:13
- Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01, John C Klensin, 08:07
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Spencer Dawkins, 03:32
- Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01, Randy Bush, 02:28
- Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01, Martin Rex, 01:31
May 08, 2013
- Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01, Joe Abley, 16:56
- Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01, S Moonesamy, 16:30
- Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01, Randy Bush, 14:53
- Re: Accessing tools from IETF pages, Dale R. Worley, 14:38
- Re: Accessing tools from IETF pages, Elwyn Davies, 14:16
- Accessing tools from IETF pages, t.p., 12:48
- Re: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6021-bis-01, S Moonesamy, 12:07
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Martin Rex, 11:55
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Jari Arkko, 10:51
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor), 10:04
May 07, 2013
- Re: Language editing, ned+ietf, 18:34
- Re: Language editing, Randy Presuhn, 16:38
- Re: Language editing, Brian E Carpenter, 16:19
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Peter Saint-Andre, 15:48
- Re: Language editing, ned+ietf, 15:41
- Re: Language editing, Brian E Carpenter, 15:06
- Re: Language editing, John C Klensin, 10:29
- Re: Language editing, ned+ietf, 10:24
- Re: Last Call: <draft-eastlake-rfc5342bis-02.txt> (IANA Considerations and IETF Protocol and Documentation Usage for IEEE 802 Parameters) to Best Current Practice, joel jaeggli, 09:22
- Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-cs-17, Gonzalo Camarillo, 06:03
- Re: Detective story (was: Language editing), Yoav Nir, 03:04
May 06, 2013
- Re: Language editing, ned+ietf, 21:51
- Re: Language editing, Mark Andrews, 21:19
- Re: IETF Diversity Question on Berlin Registration?, CJ Aronson, 21:13
- Re: Language editing, John Leslie, 20:29
- Re: Language editing, Mark Andrews, 20:00
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, John C Klensin, 17:57
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, John C Klensin, 17:56
- Detective story (was: Language editing), SM, 17:15
- Re: Language editing, John C Klensin, 17:14
- RE: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, SM, 15:32
- Re: Language editing, Brian E Carpenter, 15:23
- Re: Language editing, Dale R. Worley, 13:01
- Re: [renum] Gen-art review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-05.txt, Tim Chown, 11:27
- Re: [dhcwg] Gen-art review: draft-ietf-dhc-triggered-reconfigure-05, Robert Sparks, 11:10
- RE: Language editing, l.wood, 09:13
- RE: [dhcwg] Gen-art review: draft-ietf-dhc-triggered-reconfigure-05, mohamed.boucadair, 09:06
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Andy Bierman, 09:06
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Olaf Kolkman, 03:35
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Bill McQuillan, 02:26
- referencing RFCs (Was: Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process), Jari Arkko, 01:46
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Doug Barton, 01:42
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Måns Nilsson, 01:06
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Mark Andrews, 00:32
May 05, 2013
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Mark Andrews, 22:52
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Scott Kitterman, 22:01
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Mark Andrews, 19:11
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Scott Kitterman, 17:54
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Mark Andrews, 17:14
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, John C Klensin, 16:24
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Hector Santos, 14:04
- Re: Language editing, John C Klensin, 13:32
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, S Moonesamy, 13:06
- Re: Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], John C Klensin, 09:34
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Scott Brim, 07:39
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Benoit Claise, 07:19
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Hannes Tschofenig, 07:00
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Hannes Tschofenig, 06:55
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Benoit Claise, 06:48
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Benoit Claise, 05:51
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ted Lemon, 05:44
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Benoit Claise, 05:38
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, joel jaeggli, 05:24
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Hannes Tschofenig, 04:27
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Hannes Tschofenig, 04:24
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Hannes Tschofenig, 04:23
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Hannes Tschofenig, 04:12
May 04, 2013
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Mark Andrews, 18:26
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Mark Andrews, 18:12
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Mark Andrews, 17:14
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, S Moonesamy, 13:38
- RE: Effects on DNS can be severe &&& Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, S Moonesamy, 03:46
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg-09, Peter Yee, 01:26
May 03, 2013
- Re: [IETF] Re: Balancing the Process (Was: Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE), Mark Andrews, 19:51
- RE: Effects on DNS can be severe &&& Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Tony Hain, 19:37
- Re: Language editing, joel jaeggli, 18:59
- RE: Effects on DNS can be severe &&& Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, S Moonesamy, 18:37
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Doug Barton, 18:20
- Re: Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Bjoern Hoehrmann, 17:49
- Re: Effects on DNS can be severe, Douglas Otis, 17:40
- Gather Profiles/Resumes [was Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process], Hector Santos, 17:12
- Re: Effects on DNS can be severe &&& Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Scott Kitterman, 17:07
- Re: Language editing, Brian E Carpenter, 17:05
- Re: Language editing, Doug Barton, 16:55
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Barry Leiba, 16:39
- Re: Language editing, Yaron Sheffer, 16:22
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of DKIM (RFC 6376) to Internet Standard, Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:15
- RE: Effects on DNS can be severe &&& Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Tony Hain, 16:11
- Re: Effects on DNS can be severe, Scott Kitterman, 15:01
- Re: Effects on DNS can be severe, Douglas Otis, 14:47
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Thomas Narten, 14:41
- Re: Effects on DNS can be severe, Scott Kitterman, 14:22
- Effects on DNS can be severe, Douglas Otis, 14:07
- RE: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Tony Hain, 14:06
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of DKIM (RFC 6376) to Internet Standard, John Levine, 13:53
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Pete Resnick, 13:04
- Re: Language editing, Dale R. Worley, 13:04
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Noel David Torres Taño, 12:55
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ralph Droms, 12:47
- RE: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Tony Hain, 12:44
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Michael Richardson, 12:42
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Thomas Narten, 12:41
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, t.p., 12:38
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Thomas Narten, 12:36
- Re: [IETF] Re: Balancing the Process (Was: Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE), Warren Kumari, 12:33
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Randy Bush, 12:31
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, John Leslie, 12:24
- RE: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Adrian Farrel, 12:18
- Re: Language editing, Ralph Droms, 11:27
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Pete Resnick, 11:13
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Elwyn Davies, 10:40
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Dave Crocker, 09:37
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Thomas Narten, 09:33
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ray Pelletier, 09:30
- RE: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Adrian Farrel, 09:20
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Thomas Narten, 09:14
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Stephen Farrell, 08:28
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Thomas Narten, 07:59
- Re: Language editing, t.p., 06:58
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Jouni Korhonen, 06:11
- Re: Language editing, Scott Brim, 06:09
- Re: Language editing, Ted Lemon, 05:52
- Re: Language editing, TZI, 03:38
- Re: Language editing, t.p., 03:30
May 02, 2013
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:54
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Randy Bush, 22:44
- Re: Balancing the Process (Was: Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE), Mark Andrews, 21:48
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Jari Arkko, 21:15
- Re: Language editing, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 21:14
- Re: Balancing the Process (Was: Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE), Ted Lemon, 21:07
- Re: Balancing the Process (Was: Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE), Mark Andrews, 20:56
- Re: Language editing, Ted Lemon, 20:53
- Re: Language editing, Ted Lemon, 20:50
- Re: Language editing, Dave Crocker, 20:48
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ted Lemon, 20:47
- Re: Language editing, Carsten Bormann, 20:41
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, S Moonesamy, 18:35
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Randy Bush, 18:26
- Re: Language editing, Peter Saint-Andre, 18:13
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Dave Crocker, 17:59
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Jari Arkko, 17:26
- Re: Language editing, Marc Petit-Huguenin, 17:04
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, joel jaeggli, 16:49
- Re: Language editing (was: tails and such), Yaron Sheffer, 16:41
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Francis Dupont, 16:39
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Brian E Carpenter, 15:59
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, John Leslie, 15:29
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Martin Thomson, 15:25
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Andrew Sullivan, 14:50
- Re: A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis, Doug Barton, 14:22
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Pete Resnick, 14:18
- Re: Do we have an estimated date for completing the IESG selection process for this year?, Yoav Nir, 14:16
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Hannes Tschofenig, 13:15
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Carsten Bormann, 11:17
- A note about draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis (was: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE), S Moonesamy, 11:05
- Re: Long review tail, Stephen Farrell, 10:32
- RE: Gen-art telechat review: draft-ietf-6renum-gap-analysis-06.txt, Liubing (Leo), 10:29
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Andy Bierman, 10:28
- Re: Do we have an estimated date for completing the IESG selection process for this year?, Mankin, Allison, 10:27
- Re: Do we have an estimated date for completing the IESG selection process for this year?, Allison Mankin, 10:21
- Re: Long review tail, Fred Baker (fred), 10:20
- Balancing the Process (Was: Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE), Hector Santos, 10:15
- Re: Long review tail, Stephen Farrell, 10:13
- Long review tail, Fred Baker (fred), 09:54
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Eliot Lear, 09:53
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Francis Dupont, 08:48
- Re: Do we have an estimated date for completing the IESG selection process for this year?, Michael Richardson, 08:33
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Måns Nilsson, 05:54
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, t.p., 05:52
- Re: What's a reasonable and non-discriminatory patent license?, Alessandro Vesely, 05:25
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Alessandro Vesely, 04:20
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Alessandro Vesely, 04:01
- Re: Do we have an estimated date for completing the IESG selection process for this year?, SM, 03:00
- Re: Do we have an estimated date for completing the IESG selection process for this year?, Martin Stiemerling, 01:33
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Eggert, Lars, 00:22
May 01, 2013
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Scott Brim, 17:47
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Elwyn Davies, 17:16
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Elwyn Davies, 17:14
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ralph Droms, 16:47
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ralph Droms, 16:43
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Ted Lemon, 16:11
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Scott Brim, 16:01
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Dave Crocker, 15:17
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Brian E Carpenter, 15:05
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Michael Richardson, 14:58
- RE: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Moriarty, Kathleen, 14:42
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Carsten Bormann, 14:33
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, SM, 14:21
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Abdussalam Baryun, 14:03
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Sam Hartman, 13:20
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Michael Richardson, 13:17
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Michael Richardson, 13:12
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Dave Crocker, 13:00
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Sam Hartman, 12:44
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:35
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Paul Hoffman, 12:27
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Peter Saint-Andre, 12:11
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Carsten Bormann, 11:39
- Re: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Michael Richardson, 11:34
- call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process, Jari Arkko, 10:34
- Blind reply-alls (Was: Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE), Pete Resnick, 08:44
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Alessandro Vesely, 08:27
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Alessandro Vesely, 06:54
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Hector Santos, 05:16
- Re: [spfbis] [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:04